GSAKX vs. GGSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX).
GSAKX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jun 25, 2007. GGSIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998.
Performance
GSAKX vs. GGSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSAKX vs. GGSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSAKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A | 0.47% | 33.81% | 8.50% | 17.26% | -8.28% | 13.26% | 2.22% | 26.54% | -12.40% | 26.04% |
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio | -4.20% | 19.29% | 19.26% | 17.83% | -16.86% | 17.04% | 14.34% | 24.92% | -10.65% | 21.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSAKX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than GGSIX's -4.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSAKX having a 9.79% annualized return and GGSIX not far ahead at 9.96%.
GSAKX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -10.47%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
GGSIX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- -4.20%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSAKX vs. GGSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSAKX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GGSIX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSAKX vs. GGSIX — Risk / Return Rank
GSAKX
GGSIX
GSAKX vs. GGSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSAKX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 1.15 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 1.54 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.23 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 1.07 | +0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 4.87 | +2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSAKX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.15 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.63 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.70 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.44 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSAKX and GGSIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSAKX vs. GGSIX - Dividend Comparison
GSAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than GGSIX's 12.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSAKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A | 3.73% | 3.75% | 2.93% | 2.68% | 0.51% | 2.74% | 1.73% | 2.69% | 15.27% | 1.41% | 2.01% | 0.77% |
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio | 12.39% | 11.87% | 12.21% | 1.73% | 5.76% | 6.57% | 3.47% | 5.77% | 3.02% | 2.77% | 1.35% | 2.03% |
Drawdowns
GSAKX vs. GGSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSAKX drawdown since its inception was -56.96%, which is greater than GGSIX's maximum drawdown of -52.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAKX and GGSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSAKX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.96% | -52.85% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -10.84% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.02% | -26.74% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.49% | -30.36% | -4.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.47% | -8.71% | -1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.36% | -9.25% | -3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 2.51% | +0.52% |
Volatility
GSAKX vs. GGSIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) at 4.54%. This indicates that GSAKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSAKX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 4.54% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.42% | 8.19% | +2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.09% | 13.32% | +2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 13.34% | +1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 14.27% | +1.81% |