PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSAKX vs. GCIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSAKX vs. GCIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSAKX achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly lower than GCIIX's 12.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSAKX having a 10.54% annualized return and GCIIX not far ahead at 10.97%.


GSAKX

1D
0.38%
1M
4.08%
YTD
10.59%
6M
14.44%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
10.54%

GCIIX

1D
0.39%
1M
6.07%
YTD
12.60%
6M
15.21%
1Y
30.53%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSAKX vs. GCIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSAKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A
10.59%33.81%8.50%17.26%-8.28%13.26%2.22%26.54%-12.40%26.04%
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
12.60%40.72%9.65%20.80%-14.91%11.71%7.83%18.52%-15.82%29.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GSAKX and GCIIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.95

The correlation between GSAKX and GCIIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSAKX vs. GCIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSAKX
GSAKX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GSAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GSAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

GCIIX
GCIIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GCIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GCIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSAKX vs. GCIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSAKXGCIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.43

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.27

9.08

-0.81

GSAKX vs. GCIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSAKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the GCIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSAKX and GCIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSAKXGCIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.96

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.76

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.66

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.32

-0.05

Drawdowns

GSAKX vs. GCIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSAKX drawdown since its inception was -56.96%, smaller than the maximum GCIIX drawdown of -61.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAKX and GCIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSAKXGCIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.96%

-61.08%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-12.33%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.18%

-13.25%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-30.58%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.49%

-39.85%

+5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

0.00%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

-15.04%

+2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

3.29%

-0.15%

Volatility

GSAKX vs. GCIIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) have volatilities of 4.83% and 4.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSAKXGCIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

4.87%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

12.70%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

15.30%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

16.11%

-1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

16.79%

-0.65%

GSAKX vs. GCIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSAKX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GCIIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSAKX vs. GCIIX - Dividend Comparison

GSAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than GCIIX's 6.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
6.91%7.78%9.24%2.81%3.94%6.33%1.86%2.46%1.94%1.62%2.51%1.45%
GSAKX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A
3.39%3.75%2.93%2.68%0.51%2.74%1.73%2.69%15.27%1.41%2.01%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GSAKX and GCIIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GCIIX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to GSAKX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSAKX dropped -56.96% vs GCIIX's -61.08%.

GCIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSAKX and GCIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer