GSAHX vs. SGPIX
GSAHX (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund) and SGPIX (ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GSAHX returned 6.77%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for SGPIX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GSAHX charges 1.03%/yr vs 1.60%/yr for SGPIX.
Performance
GSAHX vs. SGPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSAHX having a 21.53% return and SGPIX slightly higher at 21.80%.
GSAHX
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- 6M
- 17.69%
- YTD
- 21.53%
- 1Y
- 32.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.23%
SGPIX
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- 6M
- 16.42%
- YTD
- 21.80%
- 1Y
- 30.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 8.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GSAHX vs. SGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSAHX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund | 21.53% | 9.13% | 21.65% | 18.80% | -28.78% | 8.38% | 54.70% | 7.21% |
SGPIX ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund | 21.80% | 3.52% | 7.53% | 15.35% | -22.72% | 13.29% | 17.43% | 4.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSAHX and SGPIX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between GSAHX and SGPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSAHX vs. SGPIX — Risk / Return Rank
GSAHX
SGPIX
GSAHX vs. SGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund (GSAHX) and ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund (SGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSAHX | SGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.93 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.43 | 9.84 | -0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSAHX vs. SGPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSAHX drawdown since its inception was -41.67%, smaller than the maximum SGPIX drawdown of -58.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAHX and SGPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSAHX | SGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.67% | -58.70% | +17.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -9.15% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.04% | -27.72% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.67% | -34.64% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.29% | -3.19% | -4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.08% | -11.20% | -2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 2.73% | +0.44% |
Volatility
GSAHX vs. SGPIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund (GSAHX) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund (SGPIX) at 4.10%. This indicates that GSAHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSAHX | SGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 4.10% | +2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.81% | 12.96% | +4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.39% | 17.84% | +4.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.84% | 21.61% | +3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.92% | 22.31% | +4.61% |
GSAHX vs. SGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSAHX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SGPIX's 1.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSAHX vs. SGPIX - Dividend Comparison
Neither GSAHX nor SGPIX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSAHX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.59% | 7.28% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGPIX ProFunds Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.58% | 0.80% | 3.80% | 2.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, GSAHX and SGPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GSAHX has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to SGPIX (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSAHX dropped -41.67% vs SGPIX's -58.70%.
SGPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSAHX and SGPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer