GSAGX vs. FHKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund (GSAGX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX).
GSAGX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 7, 1994. FHKAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008.
Performance
GSAGX vs. FHKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSAGX vs. FHKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSAGX Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund | -4.85% | 32.36% | 13.00% | -18.78% | -30.71% | -14.26% | 48.21% | 26.22% | -18.45% | 51.62% |
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A | 5.42% | 42.19% | 22.84% | -0.60% | -24.09% | -13.95% | 47.37% | 34.71% | -17.67% | 51.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSAGX achieves a -4.85% return, which is significantly lower than FHKAX's 5.42% return. Over the past 10 years, GSAGX has underperformed FHKAX with an annualized return of 4.63%, while FHKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.83% annualized return.
GSAGX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 6M
- -9.33%
- 1Y
- 13.18%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- -6.70%
- 10Y*
- 4.63%
FHKAX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 6.13%
- 1Y
- 43.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSAGX vs. FHKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSAGX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FHKAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSAGX vs. FHKAX — Risk / Return Rank
GSAGX
FHKAX
GSAGX vs. FHKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund (GSAGX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSAGX | FHKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 1.85 | -1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.97 | 2.39 | -1.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.34 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 2.48 | -1.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | 9.62 | -6.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSAGX | FHKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.85 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | 0.11 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.54 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.31 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSAGX and FHKAX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSAGX vs. FHKAX - Dividend Comparison
GSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than FHKAX's 1.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSAGX Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund | 1.41% | 1.34% | 1.40% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 6.78% | 5.02% | 0.57% | 6.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A | 1.51% | 1.59% | 1.22% | 1.58% | 0.59% | 10.80% | 4.71% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.21% | 0.99% | 15.33% |
Drawdowns
GSAGX vs. FHKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSAGX drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than FHKAX's maximum drawdown of -58.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAGX and FHKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSAGX | FHKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -58.62% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.89% | -15.97% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.97% | -54.04% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.98% | -58.62% | -5.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.86% | -10.83% | -32.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.55% | -19.15% | -9.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 4.12% | +0.49% |
Volatility
GSAGX vs. FHKAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund (GSAGX) is 6.15%, while Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that GSAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSAGX | FHKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 9.26% | -3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | 16.44% | -3.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.72% | 23.16% | -3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.37% | 23.95% | +1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.52% | 22.09% | +0.43% |