PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSAGX vs. ACEYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSAGX vs. ACEYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund (GSAGX) and AB All China Equity Portfolio (ACEYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSAGX achieves a 3.67% return, which is significantly higher than ACEYX's -1.38% return.


GSAGX

1D
-0.82%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
3.67%
6M
3.75%
1Y
23.14%
3Y*
11.84%
5Y*
-6.37%
10Y*
5.65%

ACEYX

1D
-1.28%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
-1.38%
6M
-0.23%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
12.92%
5Y*
-3.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSAGX vs. ACEYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GSAGX
Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund
3.67%32.36%13.00%-18.78%-30.71%-14.26%48.21%26.22%-14.21%
ACEYX
AB All China Equity Portfolio
-1.38%33.91%17.44%-10.96%-26.65%-14.65%25.38%37.67%-21.60%

Correlation

The correlation between GSAGX and ACEYX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.93

The correlation between GSAGX and ACEYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSAGX vs. ACEYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSAGX
GSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
GSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

ACEYX
ACEYX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ACEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ACEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSAGX vs. ACEYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund (GSAGX) and AB All China Equity Portfolio (ACEYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSAGXACEYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

1.25

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

1.75

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.22

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.49

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.12

3.92

+1.20

GSAGX vs. ACEYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the ACEYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSAGX and ACEYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSAGXACEYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.25

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

-0.15

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.09

+0.07

Drawdowns

GSAGX vs. ACEYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSAGX drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than ACEYX's maximum drawdown of -57.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAGX and ACEYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSAGXACEYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.73%

-57.58%

-13.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.15%

-14.14%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.08%

-21.83%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.97%

-51.02%

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.74%

-26.84%

-10.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.60%

-27.76%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

5.39%

-0.92%

Volatility

GSAGX vs. ACEYX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund (GSAGX) and AB All China Equity Portfolio (ACEYX) have volatilities of 6.02% and 6.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSAGXACEYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

6.10%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

12.80%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.85%

18.37%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.43%

23.31%

+2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.65%

23.57%

-0.92%

GSAGX vs. ACEYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSAGX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than ACEYX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSAGX vs. ACEYX - Dividend Comparison

GSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than ACEYX's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACEYX
AB All China Equity Portfolio
5.03%4.97%3.75%2.17%1.39%1.81%0.43%1.13%0.00%0.00%
GSAGX
Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund
1.29%1.34%1.40%0.89%0.00%6.78%5.02%0.57%6.92%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, GSAGX and ACEYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACEYX has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to GSAGX (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSAGX dropped -70.73% vs ACEYX's -57.58%.

GSAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSAGX and ACEYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer