GRW vs. SGRT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. GRW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

GRW vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GRW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: 9.59%
• YTD: 48.90%
• 6M: 51.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRW vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.46%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GRW and SGRT is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	-0.30

Return for Risk

GRW vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GRW	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	13.58	3.63	+9.95

Drawdowns

GRW vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRW drawdown since its inception was -0.45%, smaller than the maximum SGRT drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRW and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRW	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.45%	-17.87%	+17.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-1.69%	+1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	-3.10%	+2.93%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GRW	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.89%	33.40%	-24.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.89%	33.40%	-24.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.89%	33.40%	-24.51%

GRW vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

GRW vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.

Position	TTM	2025
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.11%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRW and SGRT in my portfolio?

GRW and SGRT have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GRW or SGRT?

On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GRW or SGRT?

SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GRW or SGRT?

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between GRW and SGRT?

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRW and 0.59% for SGRT.