PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GRW vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GRW vs. ITOT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TCW, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. GRW is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GRW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.

Performance

GRW vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

GRW

1D
-1.37%
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ITOT

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.50%
YTD
10.37%
6M
9.62%
1Y
27.18%
3Y*
21.20%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
15.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRW vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)
GRW
TCW Durable Growth ETF		2.62%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF		-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GRW and ITOT is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

0.80

GRW vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
GRW
ITOT

Industrials

39.6%
9.1%

Technology

26.0%
37.2%

Financial Services

8.6%
11.4%

Communication Services

7.8%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
9.8%

Basic Materials

3.8%
2.0%

Healthcare

3.6%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.3%

Energy

-

3.3%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Industrials

GRW
39.6%
ITOT
9.1%

Technology

GRW
26.0%
ITOT
37.2%

Financial Services

GRW
8.6%
ITOT
11.4%

Communication Services

GRW
7.8%
ITOT
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GRW
7.4%
ITOT
9.8%

Basic Materials

GRW
3.8%
ITOT
2.0%

Healthcare

GRW
3.6%
ITOT
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

GRW

-

ITOT
4.3%

Energy

GRW

-

ITOT
3.3%

Real Estate

GRW

-

ITOT
2.3%

Utilities

GRW

-

ITOT
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TCW Durable Growth ETF

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF

Often compared with GRW:
GRW vs. SUPPGRW vs. AIFDGRW vs. ALTLGRW vs. ACLOGRW vs. MUSEGRW vs. BBHLGRW vs. IGCB
Often compared with ITOT:
ITOT vs. VTIITOT vs. VOOITOT vs. SCHBITOT vs. SPYITOT vs. FSKAXITOT vs. IVVITOT vs. IXUS

Return for Risk

GRW vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GRW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRW vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

GRWITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

2.14

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

2.89

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.38

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

3.07

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

13.65

—

GRW vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRW vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRW drawdown since its inception was -3.83%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRW and ITOT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GRWITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-55.20%

+51.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-8.90%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-19.44%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-25.36%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.00%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-1.51%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-6.96%

+6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

2.00%

—

Volatility

GRW vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GRWITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

4.78%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

9.98%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.32%

12.80%

+6.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.32%

17.45%

+1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

18.31%

+1.01%

GRW vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

GRW vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRW
TCW Durable Growth ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF		1.01%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

GRW and ITOT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

GRW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: TCW and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRW and 0.03% for ITOT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRW and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer