GRW vs. HYP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) and HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GRW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HYP.

Performance

GRW vs. HYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GRW

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYP

• 1D: 2.01%
• 1M: 6.37%
• YTD: 36.25%
• 6M: 30.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRW vs. HYP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	2.62%
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	3.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GRW and HYP is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.41

Return for Risk

GRW vs. HYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

GRW vs. HYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRW drawdown since its inception was -3.83%, smaller than the maximum HYP drawdown of -19.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRW and HYP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRW	HYP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-19.58%	+15.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	0.00%	-1.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.92%	-6.44%	+5.52%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GRW	HYP	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.32%	42.95%	-23.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.32%	42.95%	-23.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.32%	42.95%	-23.63%

GRW vs. HYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HYP's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

GRW vs. HYP - Dividend Comparison

GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.

Position	TTM	2025
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	0.10%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRW and HYP in my portfolio?

GRW and HYP have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GRW or HYP?

On fees, GRW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GRW or HYP?

GRW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GRW or HYP?

HYP has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between GRW and HYP?

They also come from different issuers: TCW and Golden Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRW and 0.85% for HYP.