GRW vs. GQGU
GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.33 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GRW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.
Performance
GRW vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GRW
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GQGU
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 6.80%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.04M | $3.49M | $3.46M | |
| $173.33K | $124.39K | $212.92K |
GRW vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 2.98% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | -0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRW and GQGU is -0.33, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRW vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
GRW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GQGU
GRW vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRW | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRW vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRW drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum GQGU drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRW and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRW | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -8.41% | +4.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -4.47% | +2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -3.00% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.64% | — |
Volatility
GRW vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRW | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.72% | 10.67% | +5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 10.58% | +5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 10.58% | +5.14% |
GRW vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRW vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.95% | 1.02% |
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRW and GQGU have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.
They also come from different issuers: TCW and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRW and 0.49% for GQGU.
Find the right allocation for GRW and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer