GRSPX vs. BRUFX
GRSPX (Greenspring Fund) and BRUFX (Bruce Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, GRSPX returned 9.71%/yr vs 7.63%/yr for BRUFX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GRSPX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BRUFX.
Performance
GRSPX vs. BRUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRSPX achieves a 19.30% return, which is significantly higher than BRUFX's 15.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GRSPX has outperformed BRUFX with an annualized return of 9.71%, while BRUFX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.63% annualized return.
GRSPX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 40.29%
- 6M
- 15.34%
- YTD
- 19.30%
- 1Y
- 19.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
BRUFX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- YTD
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 26.52%
- 3Y*
- 12.44%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
GRSPX vs. BRUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRSPX Greenspring Fund | 19.30% | 6.12% | 15.53% | 11.95% | -8.62% | 26.89% | 3.81% | 20.84% | -10.21% | 7.84% |
BRUFX Bruce Fund | 15.52% | 14.89% | 4.45% | -0.74% | -8.80% | 17.35% | 12.06% | 22.42% | -3.99% | 12.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRSPX and BRUFX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1990 | 0.48 |
The correlation between GRSPX and BRUFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRSPX vs. BRUFX — Risk / Return Rank
GRSPX
BRUFX
GRSPX vs. BRUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) and Bruce Fund (BRUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRSPX | BRUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.44 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 3.49 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.73 | 15.51 | -8.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRSPX vs. BRUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRSPX drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum BRUFX drawdown of -44.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRSPX and BRUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRSPX | BRUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -44.50% | +8.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.41% | -7.67% | -22.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.41% | -9.66% | -20.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | -17.91% | -12.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -25.44% | -9.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.44% | -0.69% | -2.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -9.05% | +4.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 1.72% | +1.39% |
Volatility
GRSPX vs. BRUFX - Volatility Comparison
Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) has a higher volatility of 50.69% compared to Bruce Fund (BRUFX) at 3.06%. This indicates that GRSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRSPX | BRUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 50.69% | 3.06% | +47.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.01% | 8.41% | +42.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.39% | 10.75% | +45.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.19% | 10.57% | +17.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.52% | 11.64% | +10.88% |
GRSPX vs. BRUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRSPX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BRUFX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRSPX vs. BRUFX - Dividend Comparison
GRSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%, more than BRUFX's 5.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRUFX Bruce Fund | 5.50% | 6.35% | 5.01% | 6.46% | 13.31% | 9.25% | 5.83% | 2.03% | 2.49% | 4.11% | 6.26% | 4.63% |
GRSPX Greenspring Fund | 7.88% | 9.40% | 6.70% | 6.84% | 8.04% | 7.69% | 2.39% | 7.89% | 11.05% | 9.63% | 6.81% | 5.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRSPX and BRUFX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRSPX has higher volatility (50.69%) compared to BRUFX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRSPX dropped -35.67% vs BRUFX's -44.50%.
BRUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRSPX and BRUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer