PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRSPX vs. BLPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRSPX vs. BLPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) and American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRSPX achieves a 20.56% return, which is significantly higher than BLPAX's 6.23% return. Over the past 10 years, GRSPX has outperformed BLPAX with an annualized return of 10.41%, while BLPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.29% annualized return.


GRSPX

1D
-1.11%
1M
1.13%
YTD
20.56%
6M
18.80%
1Y
24.57%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
10.41%

BLPAX

1D
-0.84%
1M
0.24%
YTD
6.23%
6M
5.66%
1Y
15.65%
3Y*
14.17%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRSPX vs. BLPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRSPX
Greenspring Fund
20.56%6.12%16.03%11.95%-8.62%26.89%3.81%20.84%-10.21%7.84%
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
6.23%16.64%11.30%13.87%-13.60%13.87%13.16%19.53%-4.59%16.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GRSPX and BLPAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.79

The correlation between GRSPX and BLPAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRSPX vs. BLPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRSPX
GRSPX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GRSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GRSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

BLPAX
BLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRSPX vs. BLPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) and American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRSPXBLPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

2.31

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

10.16

-1.30

GRSPX vs. BLPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRSPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the BLPAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRSPX and BLPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRSPX vs. BLPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRSPX drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, which is greater than BLPAX's maximum drawdown of -23.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRSPX and BLPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRSPXBLPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.67%

-23.21%

-12.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.41%

-7.26%

-23.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.41%

-10.62%

-19.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.41%

-20.65%

-9.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

-23.21%

-11.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-1.35%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-2.91%

-1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

1.65%

+1.44%

Volatility

GRSPX vs. BLPAX - Volatility Comparison

Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) has a higher volatility of 50.72% compared to American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A (BLPAX) at 3.47%. This indicates that GRSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRSPXBLPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

50.72%

3.47%

+47.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.94%

7.42%

+43.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.42%

9.04%

+47.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.15%

10.49%

+17.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.51%

10.82%

+11.69%

GRSPX vs. BLPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRSPX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BLPAX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRSPX vs. BLPAX - Dividend Comparison

GRSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.80%, more than BLPAX's 5.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLPAX
American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio Class A
5.49%5.83%3.59%2.30%6.01%4.97%2.56%3.83%4.69%3.48%3.66%3.69%
GRSPX
Greenspring Fund
7.80%9.40%7.14%6.84%8.04%7.69%2.39%7.89%11.05%9.63%6.81%5.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRSPX and BLPAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRSPX has higher volatility (50.72%) compared to BLPAX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRSPX dropped -35.67% vs BLPAX's -23.21%.

BLPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRSPX and BLPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer