PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRPM vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRPM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRPM achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, GRPM has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 11.33%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.07% annualized return.


GRPM

1D
-0.35%
1M
2.06%
6M
11.71%
YTD
13.17%
1Y
21.04%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
11.33%
ALL TIME*
11.48%

SPY

1D
0.72%
1M
0.30%
6M
8.53%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.07%
ALL TIME*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.43M$1.18M$1.33M
$37.27B$35.99B$39.23B

GRPM vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
13.17%7.81%15.67%18.79%-11.63%26.35%15.60%23.05%-12.45%13.05%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.13%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GRPM and SPY is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010

0.81

The correlation between GRPM and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GRPM vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GRPM
SPY

Financial Services

23.3%
12.5%

Technology

20.8%
36.9%

Healthcare

19.0%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
8.9%

Industrials

12.3%
7.6%

Energy

5.0%
3.4%

Basic Materials

3.8%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
4.8%

Communication Services

-

9.7%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Financial Services

GRPM
23.3%
SPY
12.5%

Technology

GRPM
20.8%
SPY
36.9%

Healthcare

GRPM
19.0%
SPY
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GRPM
13.1%
SPY
8.9%

Industrials

GRPM
12.3%
SPY
7.6%

Energy

GRPM
5.0%
SPY
3.4%

Basic Materials

GRPM
3.8%
SPY
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

GRPM
2.6%
SPY
4.8%

Communication Services

GRPM

-

SPY
9.7%

Real Estate

GRPM

-

SPY
2.0%

Utilities

GRPM

-

SPY
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRPM vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GRPM
GRPM Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GRPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRPM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GRPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GRPM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRPMSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.27

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

2.20

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.67

9.40

-1.73

GRPM vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPM Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPM and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRPM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPM drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPM and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRPMSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-55.19%

+12.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-8.88%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

-18.76%

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-24.50%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.12%

-33.72%

-9.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-1.40%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-9.01%

+3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.08%

+0.48%

Volatility

GRPM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.58%. This indicates that GRPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRPMSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

3.58%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

10.14%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

12.89%

+2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.80%

17.18%

+3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.19%

17.95%

+4.24%

GRPM vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRPM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRPM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

GRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than SPY's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
0.70%1.19%0.95%0.96%1.28%0.92%1.16%1.25%1.50%1.14%1.00%1.43%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRPM and SPY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRPM has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to SPY (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPM dropped -43.12% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.07% vs 11.33% for GRPM. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.07% return vs 11.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GRPM.

SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.70% for GRPM.

GRPM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. GRPM tracks S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GRPM and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRPM and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer