GRPM vs. SIXL

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

GRPM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF) and SIXL (ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. GRPM is passively managed, while SIXL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GRPM returned 9.14%/yr vs 4.98%/yr for SIXL. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRPM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SIXL.

Performance

GRPM vs. SIXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRPM achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly lower than SIXL's 11.30% return.

GRPM

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.59%
• 6M: 8.43%
• YTD: 10.58%
• 1Y: 18.16%
• 3Y*: 13.61%
• 5Y*: 9.14%
• 10Y*: 11.01%

SIXL

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 3.11%
• 6M: 8.02%
• YTD: 11.30%
• 1Y: 11.75%
• 3Y*: 9.90%
• 5Y*: 4.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRPM vs. SIXL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF	10.58%	7.81%	15.67%	18.79%	-11.63%	26.35%	44.03%
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	11.30%	-0.61%	14.13%	2.38%	-7.49%	20.00%	18.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GRPM and SIXL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between GRPM and SIXL has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GRPM vs. SIXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GRPM	SIXL
Financial Services	21.1%	15.6%
Healthcare	18.9%	15.6%
Technology	17.7%	2.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	5.4%
Industrials	8.8%	5.6%
Energy	4.9%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	17.0%
Basic Materials	3.8%	2.3%
Communication Services	-	2.5%
Real Estate	-	14.0%
Utilities	-	17.0%

Return for Risk

GRPM vs. SIXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRPM

GRPM Risk / Return Rank: 46
GRPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GRPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
GRPM Omega Ratio Rank: 37
GRPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
GRPM Martin Ratio Rank: 52

SIXL

SIXL Risk / Return Rank: 41
SIXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SIXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SIXL Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SIXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SIXL Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRPM vs. SIXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GRPM	SIXL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	1.15	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	1.71	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.20	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	1.81	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.00	4.82	+2.19

GRPM vs. SIXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPM Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the SIXL Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPM and SIXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GRPM vs. SIXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPM drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than SIXL's maximum drawdown of -16.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPM and SIXL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRPM	SIXL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.12%	-16.08%	-27.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.62%	-6.52%	-1.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.09%	-11.65%	-16.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.09%	-16.08%	-12.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-0.32%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-4.52%	-1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	2.45%	+0.15%

Volatility

GRPM vs. SIXL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) have volatilities of 3.89% and 4.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRPM	SIXL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.89%	4.03%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.51%	7.34%	+3.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.97%	10.25%	+5.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.84%	12.25%	+8.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.18%	12.59%	+9.59%

GRPM vs. SIXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRPM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXL's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

GRPM vs. SIXL - Dividend Comparison

GRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than SIXL's 2.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF	0.72%	1.19%	0.95%	0.96%	1.28%	0.92%	1.16%	1.25%	1.50%	1.14%	1.00%	1.43%
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	2.18%	2.31%	1.28%	1.48%	1.45%	0.67%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRPM and SIXL in my portfolio?

GRPM and SIXL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GRPM or SIXL?

SIXL has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to GRPM (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPM dropped -43.12% vs SIXL's -16.08%.

Which ETF is better, GRPM or SIXL?

On 5-year performance, GRPM leads with 9.14% vs 4.98% for SIXL. On fees, GRPM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GRPM has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GRPM or SIXL?

Over the 5-year period, GRPM has performed better with a 9.14% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GRPM or SIXL?

GRPM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SIXL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GRPM or SIXL?

SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 0.72% for GRPM.

What is the main difference between GRPM and SIXL?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GRPM and 0.47% for SIXL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.