GRPM vs. RUNN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN).

GRPM and RUNN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GRPM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2010. RUNN is an actively managed fund by Running Oak Capital. It was launched on Jun 7, 2023.

Performance

GRPM vs. RUNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GRPM vs. RUNN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF	-0.72%	7.81%	15.67%	11.08%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	-2.84%	2.30%	17.16%	12.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRPM achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly higher than RUNN's -2.84% return.

GRPM

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -3.02%
• YTD: -0.72%
• 6M: -1.34%
• 1Y: 14.05%
• 3Y*: 12.14%
• 5Y*: 6.89%
• 10Y*: 10.59%

RUNN

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -6.32%
• YTD: -2.84%
• 6M: -5.00%
• 1Y: 0.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRPM vs. RUNN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRPM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RUNN's 0.58% expense ratio.

RUNN

Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF

GRPM

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF

Return for Risk

GRPM vs. RUNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRPM

GRPM Risk / Return Rank: 34
GRPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GRPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
GRPM Omega Ratio Rank: 32
GRPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
GRPM Martin Ratio Rank: 41

RUNN

RUNN Risk / Return Rank: 12
RUNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
RUNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
RUNN Omega Ratio Rank: 11
RUNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RUNN Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRPM vs. RUNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GRPM	RUNN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	0.02	+0.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.03	0.15	+0.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.02	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	0.04	+0.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.03	0.11	+3.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GRPM vs. RUNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPM Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the RUNN Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPM and RUNN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GRPM	RUNN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61	0.02	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.72	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between GRPM and RUNN is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GRPM vs. RUNN - Dividend Comparison

GRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than RUNN's 0.57% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF	1.04%	1.19%	0.95%	0.96%	1.28%	0.92%	1.16%	1.25%	1.50%	1.14%	1.00%	1.43%
RUNN Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF	0.57%	0.55%	0.39%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GRPM vs. RUNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPM drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than RUNN's maximum drawdown of -16.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPM and RUNN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRPM	RUNN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.12%	-16.83%	-26.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.51%	-10.60%	-4.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.69%	-7.74%	+3.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.76%	-3.36%	-2.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.68%	3.82%	-0.14%

Volatility

GRPM vs. RUNN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) at 4.42%. This indicates that GRPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRPM	RUNN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.92%	4.42%	+0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.10%	9.85%	+2.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.17%	16.68%	+6.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.99%	13.87%	+7.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.27%	13.87%	+8.40%