PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRPM vs. OPTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRPM vs. OPTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRPM achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly lower than OPTZ's 29.14% return.


GRPM

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.59%
6M
8.43%
YTD
10.58%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
13.61%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
11.01%

OPTZ

1D
-1.92%
1M
-1.80%
6M
24.29%
YTD
29.14%
1Y
49.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRPM vs. OPTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
10.58%7.81%-0.36%
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
29.14%22.83%16.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GRPM and OPTZ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024

0.76

The correlation between GRPM and OPTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

GRPM vs. OPTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GRPM
OPTZ

Financial Services

21.1%
8.0%

Healthcare

18.9%
9.4%

Technology

17.7%
55.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
8.5%

Industrials

8.8%
8.2%

Energy

4.9%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.8%
1.1%

Communication Services

-

2.6%

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Utilities

-

0.6%

Financial Services

GRPM
21.1%
OPTZ
8.0%

Healthcare

GRPM
18.9%
OPTZ
9.4%

Technology

GRPM
17.7%
OPTZ
55.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GRPM
9.3%
OPTZ
8.5%

Industrials

GRPM
8.8%
OPTZ
8.2%

Energy

GRPM
4.9%
OPTZ
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

GRPM
4.3%
OPTZ
3.5%

Basic Materials

GRPM
3.8%
OPTZ
1.1%

Communication Services

GRPM

-

OPTZ
2.6%

Real Estate

GRPM

-

OPTZ
1.4%

Utilities

GRPM

-

OPTZ
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRPM vs. OPTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRPM
GRPM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GRPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRPM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GRPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRPM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

OPTZ
OPTZ Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
OPTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
OPTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRPM vs. OPTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRPMOPTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.41

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

4.71

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.00

18.97

-11.96

GRPM vs. OPTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPM Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the OPTZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPM and OPTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRPM vs. OPTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPM drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than OPTZ's maximum drawdown of -25.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPM and OPTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRPMOPTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-25.75%

-17.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-10.63%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-6.46%

+5.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-3.37%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.63%

-0.03%

Volatility

GRPM vs. OPTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) is 3.89%, while Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a volatility of 10.38%. This indicates that GRPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRPMOPTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

10.38%

-6.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

17.60%

-7.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.97%

20.97%

-5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

21.64%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.18%

21.64%

+0.54%

GRPM vs. OPTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRPM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than OPTZ's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRPM vs. OPTZ - Dividend Comparison

GRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than OPTZ's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF
0.72%1.19%0.95%0.96%1.28%0.92%1.16%1.25%1.50%1.14%1.00%1.43%
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
0.45%0.58%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRPM and OPTZ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPTZ has higher volatility (10.38%) compared to GRPM (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPM dropped -43.12% vs OPTZ's -25.75%.

On 1-year performance, OPTZ leads with 49.80% vs 18.16% for GRPM. On fees, OPTZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GRPM has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OPTZ has performed better with a 49.80% return vs 18.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OPTZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GRPM.

GRPM has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.45% for OPTZ.

GRPM tracks S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index, while OPTZ tracks Optimize Strategy Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Optimize. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GRPM and 0.25% for OPTZ.

OPTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRPM and OPTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer