GRPM vs. FLMVX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GRPM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF) and FLMVX (JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund) are both funds - GRPM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index, while FLMVX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by JPMorgan. Over the past 10 years, GRPM returned 10.99%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for FLMVX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GRPM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FLMVX.

Performance

GRPM vs. FLMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRPM achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly higher than FLMVX's 7.36% return. Over the past 10 years, GRPM has outperformed FLMVX with an annualized return of 10.99%, while FLMVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.20% annualized return.

GRPM

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 8.28%
• 6M: 7.33%
• 1Y: 24.17%
• 3Y*: 15.72%
• 5Y*: 7.89%
• 10Y*: 10.99%

FLMVX

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 7.36%
• 6M: 7.67%
• 1Y: 14.50%
• 3Y*: 17.56%
• 5Y*: 8.99%
• 10Y*: 10.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRPM vs. FLMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF	8.28%	7.81%	15.67%	18.79%	-11.63%	26.35%	15.60%	23.05%	-12.45%	13.05%
FLMVX JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund	7.36%	5.17%	27.75%	11.38%	-8.11%	29.89%	0.36%	26.67%	-11.66%	13.67%

Correlation

The correlation between GRPM and FLMVX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2010	0.90

The correlation between GRPM and FLMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GRPM vs. FLMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRPM

GRPM Risk / Return Rank: 50
GRPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
GRPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
GRPM Omega Ratio Rank: 41
GRPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
GRPM Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FLMVX

FLMVX Risk / Return Rank: 22
FLMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FLMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FLMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
FLMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FLMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRPM vs. FLMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GRPM	FLMVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.18	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	1.82	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.21	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	1.96	+1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.42	6.62	+2.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GRPM vs. FLMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPM Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the FLMVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPM and FLMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GRPM	FLMVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.18	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.47	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.50	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.62	-0.07

Drawdowns

GRPM vs. FLMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPM drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum FLMVX drawdown of -54.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPM and FLMVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRPM	FLMVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.12%	-54.72%	+11.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.62%	-7.19%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.09%	-15.91%	-12.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.09%	-25.59%	-2.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.12%	-43.06%	-0.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.70%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.71%	-6.45%	+0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	2.13%	+0.44%

Volatility

GRPM vs. FLMVX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) at 2.64%. This indicates that GRPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRPM	FLMVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.77%	2.64%	+1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.45%	8.46%	+1.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.05%	11.99%	+4.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.90%	19.36%	+1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.25%	20.43%	+1.82%

GRPM vs. FLMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRPM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FLMVX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GRPM vs. FLMVX - Dividend Comparison

GRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than FLMVX's 19.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLMVX JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund	19.71%	21.16%	23.25%	6.10%	11.73%	14.98%	7.73%	5.20%	8.30%	2.71%	7.04%	6.69%
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF	0.95%	1.19%	0.95%	0.96%	1.28%	0.92%	1.16%	1.25%	1.50%	1.14%	1.00%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRPM and FLMVX in my portfolio?

GRPM and FLMVX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GRPM or FLMVX?

GRPM has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to FLMVX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPM dropped -43.12% vs FLMVX's -54.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GRPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.