PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLMVX vs. MVCAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLMVX and MVCAX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

FLMVX vs. MVCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) and MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.78%
-5.52%
FLMVX
MVCAX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLMVX:

0.25

MVCAX:

0.26

Sortino Ratio

FLMVX:

0.40

MVCAX:

0.42

Omega Ratio

FLMVX:

1.07

MVCAX:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

FLMVX:

0.18

MVCAX:

0.25

Martin Ratio

FLMVX:

0.60

MVCAX:

0.64

Ulcer Index

FLMVX:

6.54%

MVCAX:

6.35%

Daily Std Dev

FLMVX:

15.62%

MVCAX:

15.82%

Max Drawdown

FLMVX:

-59.54%

MVCAX:

-59.10%

Current Drawdown

FLMVX:

-18.09%

MVCAX:

-13.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLMVX achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly higher than MVCAX's 2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FLMVX has underperformed MVCAX with an annualized return of 0.98%, while MVCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.26% annualized return.


FLMVX

YTD

2.88%

1M

0.11%

6M

-3.85%

1Y

4.32%

5Y*

0.13%

10Y*

0.98%

MVCAX

YTD

2.25%

1M

-0.70%

6M

-5.66%

1Y

4.67%

5Y*

5.79%

10Y*

5.26%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLMVX vs. MVCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLMVX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MVCAX's 1.02% expense ratio.


MVCAX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund
Expense ratio chart for MVCAX: current value at 1.02% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.02%
Expense ratio chart for FLMVX: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLMVX vs. MVCAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLMVX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLMVX is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLMVX is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLMVX is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLMVX is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLMVX is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLMVX is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MVCAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MVCAX is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MVCAX is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MVCAX is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MVCAX is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MVCAX is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MVCAX is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLMVX vs. MVCAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) and MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLMVX, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.250.26
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLMVX, currently valued at 0.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.400.42
The chart of Omega ratio for FLMVX, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.071.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLMVX, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.180.25
The chart of Martin ratio for FLMVX, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.000.600.64
FLMVX
MVCAX

The current FLMVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is comparable to the MVCAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLMVX and MVCAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.25
0.26
FLMVX
MVCAX

Dividends

FLMVX vs. MVCAX - Dividend Comparison

FLMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than MVCAX's 0.94% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLMVX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund
1.02%1.05%1.32%1.25%0.81%1.22%1.30%1.75%0.91%0.87%0.93%1.08%
MVCAX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund
0.94%0.96%1.28%1.40%0.92%0.80%0.91%0.96%0.42%1.12%0.31%7.08%

Drawdowns

FLMVX vs. MVCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLMVX drawdown since its inception was -59.54%, roughly equal to the maximum MVCAX drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMVX and MVCAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-18.09%
-13.55%
FLMVX
MVCAX

Volatility

FLMVX vs. MVCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) is 2.63%, while MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that FLMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.63%
3.02%
FLMVX
MVCAX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab