GRNY vs. MSI
GRNY (Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tidal ETFs, while MSI (Motorola Solutions, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, GRNY returned 26.59% vs -1.60% for MSI. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRNY vs. MSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRNY achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than MSI's 6.41% return.
GRNY
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 26.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSI
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- -1.60%
- 3Y*
- 14.78%
- 5Y*
- 15.60%
- 10Y*
- 21.53%
GRNY vs. MSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF | 9.21% | 24.05% | -1.09% |
MSI Motorola Solutions, Inc. | 6.41% | -16.17% | -1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRNY and MSI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRNY vs. MSI — Risk / Return Rank
GRNY
MSI
GRNY vs. MSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) and Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRNY | MSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.01 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | -0.06 | +2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | -0.12 | +7.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRNY | MSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | -0.07 | +1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.24 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
GRNY vs. MSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNY drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, smaller than the maximum MSI drawdown of -93.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNY and MSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRNY | MSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.18% | -93.60% | +69.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -25.45% | +13.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -18.10% | +15.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -40.71% | +36.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.81% | 13.09% | -9.28% |
Volatility
GRNY vs. MSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) is 5.02%, while Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI) has a volatility of 14.42%. This indicates that GRNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRNY | MSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 14.42% | -9.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.09% | 19.64% | -6.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.86% | 23.77% | -5.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.25% | 23.07% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.25% | 25.16% | -1.91% |
Dividends
GRNY vs. MSI - Dividend Comparison
GRNY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSI Motorola Solutions, Inc. | 1.13% | 1.17% | 0.87% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 1.07% | 1.55% | 1.46% | 1.85% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRNY and MSI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSI has higher volatility (14.42%) compared to GRNY (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRNY dropped -24.18% vs MSI's -93.60%.
GRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRNY and MSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer