PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRNY vs. CACI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRNY vs. CACI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) and CACI International Inc (CACI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNY achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than CACI's -2.57% return.


GRNY

1D
0.52%
1M
0.19%
YTD
9.21%
6M
7.56%
1Y
26.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CACI

1D
-2.31%
1M
7.93%
YTD
-2.57%
6M
-12.52%
1Y
16.54%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
14.78%
10Y*
17.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRNY vs. CACI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF
9.21%24.05%-1.09%
CACI
CACI International Inc
-2.57%31.86%-27.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GRNY and CACI is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRNY vs. CACI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNY
GRNY Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

CACI
CACI Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CACI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CACI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CACI Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CACI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CACI Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNY vs. CACI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) and CACI International Inc (CACI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRNYCACIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.12

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

0.61

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.00

1.50

+5.50

GRNY vs. CACI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the CACI Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRNY and CACI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRNYCACIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

0.52

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.39

+0.50

Drawdowns

GRNY vs. CACI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNY drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, smaller than the maximum CACI drawdown of -62.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNY and CACI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRNYCACIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.18%

-62.89%

+38.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-27.36%

+15.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.59%

-21.60%

+19.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-19.09%

+15.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

11.07%

-7.26%

Volatility

GRNY vs. CACI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) is 5.02%, while CACI International Inc (CACI) has a volatility of 7.81%. This indicates that GRNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CACI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRNYCACIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

7.81%

-2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

23.76%

-10.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

32.07%

-14.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.25%

26.93%

-3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.25%

28.07%

-4.82%

Dividends

GRNY vs. CACI - Dividend Comparison

Neither GRNY nor CACI has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GRNY and CACI have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CACI has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to GRNY (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRNY dropped -24.18% vs CACI's -62.89%.

GRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRNY and CACI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer