GRNJ vs. USMF
GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) and USMF (WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. GRNJ is actively managed, while USMF is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRNJ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for USMF.
Performance
GRNJ vs. USMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRNJ achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly higher than USMF's 3.99% return.
GRNJ
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -9.29%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USMF
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 1Y
- 6.49%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.81%
- 10Y*
- —
GRNJ vs. USMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 11.94% | 6.02% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 3.99% | 2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRNJ and USMF is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRNJ vs. USMF — Risk / Return Rank
GRNJ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USMF
GRNJ vs. USMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRNJ | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.10 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRNJ vs. USMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNJ drawdown since its inception was -17.32%, smaller than the maximum USMF drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNJ and USMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRNJ | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.32% | -36.24% | +18.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.27% | -2.49% | -9.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -4.12% | -0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.06% | — |
Volatility
GRNJ vs. USMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRNJ | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.47% | 11.41% | +19.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.47% | 14.39% | +16.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.47% | 16.96% | +13.51% |
GRNJ vs. USMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRNJ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than USMF's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRNJ vs. USMF - Dividend Comparison
GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 1.32% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.74% | 1.42% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRNJ and USMF have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.
USMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.
They also come from different issuers: Fundstrat and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRNJ and 0.28% for USMF.
Find the right allocation for GRNJ and USMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer