GRNJ vs. PEXL
GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) and PEXL (Pacer US Export Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. GRNJ is actively managed, while PEXL is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GRNJ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PEXL.
Performance
GRNJ vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRNJ achieves a 22.19% return, which is significantly higher than PEXL's 19.63% return.
GRNJ
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 22.19%
- 6M
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEXL
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 19.63%
- 6M
- 18.58%
- 1Y
- 45.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- —
GRNJ vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 22.19% | 6.02% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 19.63% | 7.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRNJ and PEXL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRNJ vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank
GRNJ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PEXL
GRNJ vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRNJ | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRNJ vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNJ drawdown since its inception was -17.32%, smaller than the maximum PEXL drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNJ and PEXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRNJ | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.32% | -36.76% | +19.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.23% | -3.37% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -6.69% | +2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.76% | — |
Volatility
GRNJ vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRNJ | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.86% | 19.25% | +11.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.86% | 22.12% | +8.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.86% | 24.13% | +6.73% |
GRNJ vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRNJ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PEXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRNJ vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison
GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PEXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 0.30% | 0.44% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.60% | 0.22% | 0.48% | 0.49% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRNJ and PEXL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PEXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PEXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.
PEXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.
They also come from different issuers: Fundstrat and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRNJ and 0.60% for PEXL.
Find the right allocation for GRNJ and PEXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer