GRNB vs. TMSF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GRNB (VanEck Green Bond ETF) and TMSF (T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRNB is a Global Bonds fund tracking the S&P Green Bond U.S. Dollar Select Index, while TMSF is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. GRNB is passively managed, while TMSF is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRNB charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for TMSF.

Performance

GRNB vs. TMSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNB achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than TMSF's 1.71% return.

GRNB

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 6M: 0.57%
• 1Y: 4.99%
• 3Y*: 5.07%
• 5Y*: 0.77%
• 10Y*: —

TMSF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 1.71%
• 6M: 2.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRNB vs. TMSF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GRNB VanEck Green Bond ETF	0.43%	0.58%
TMSF T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF	1.71%	1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GRNB and TMSF is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.68

Return for Risk

GRNB vs. TMSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNB

GRNB Risk / Return Rank: 47
GRNB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
GRNB Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
GRNB Omega Ratio Rank: 51
GRNB Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GRNB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNB vs. TMSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GRNB	TMSF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.82	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GRNB	TMSF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	1.99	-1.53

Drawdowns

GRNB vs. TMSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNB drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, which is greater than TMSF's maximum drawdown of -2.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNB and TMSF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRNB	TMSF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.08%	-2.28%	-15.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-0.25%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-0.38%	-4.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.64%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GRNB	TMSF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.93%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.34%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.96%	2.94%	+0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.92%	2.94%	+1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.88%	2.94%	+1.94%

GRNB vs. TMSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRNB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TMSF's 0.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

GRNB vs. TMSF - Dividend Comparison

GRNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than TMSF's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GRNB VanEck Green Bond ETF	4.24%	4.18%	3.83%	3.17%	2.60%	1.97%	2.24%	1.79%	1.21%	1.09%
TMSF T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF	3.06%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRNB and TMSF in my portfolio?

GRNB and TMSF have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GRNB or TMSF?

On fees, GRNB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GRNB or TMSF?

GRNB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for TMSF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GRNB or TMSF?

GRNB has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 3.06% for TMSF.

What is the main difference between GRNB and TMSF?

GRNB is categorized as Global Bonds, while TMSF is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GRNB and 0.37% for TMSF.