PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRNB vs. DFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GRNB vs. DFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF (DFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GRNB vs. DFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
-0.87%7.09%3.31%5.30%
DFGX
Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF
-0.35%3.46%3.75%4.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNB achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly lower than DFGX's -0.35% return.


GRNB

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
-0.87%
6M
0.15%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*

DFGX

1D
0.61%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
-0.10%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GRNB vs. DFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GRNB and DFGX have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

GRNB vs. DFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNB
GRNB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GRNB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRNB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRNB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GRNB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRNB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DFGX
DFGX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
DFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNB vs. DFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF (DFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRNBDFGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

0.71

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

1.00

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

0.92

+0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.81

3.61

+3.20

GRNB vs. DFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRNB Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the DFGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRNB and DFGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRNBDFGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

0.71

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.09

-0.65

Correlation

The correlation between GRNB and DFGX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GRNB vs. DFGX - Dividend Comparison

GRNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than DFGX's 2.78% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
4.29%4.18%3.83%3.17%2.60%1.97%2.24%1.79%1.21%1.09%
DFGX
Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF
2.78%2.84%4.61%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GRNB vs. DFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNB drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, which is greater than DFGX's maximum drawdown of -3.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNB and DFGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GRNBDFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.08%

-3.32%

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-3.32%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-2.47%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-0.70%

-3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.85%

-0.25%

Volatility

GRNB vs. DFGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) is 1.69%, while Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF (DFGX) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that GRNB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GRNBDFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

1.99%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

2.69%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51%

4.45%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

4.59%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.91%

4.59%

+0.32%