GRNB vs. DFGP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GRNB (VanEck Green Bond ETF) and DFGP (Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF) are both Global Bonds funds. GRNB is passively managed, while DFGP is actively managed. Over the past year, GRNB returned 4.99% vs 5.12% for DFGP. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GRNB charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DFGP.

Performance

GRNB vs. DFGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNB achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than DFGP's 1.11% return.

GRNB

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 6M: 0.57%
• 1Y: 4.99%
• 3Y*: 5.07%
• 5Y*: 0.77%
• 10Y*: —

DFGP

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 0.81%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRNB vs. DFGP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GRNB VanEck Green Bond ETF	0.43%	7.09%	3.31%	5.30%
DFGP Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF	1.11%	5.89%	3.71%	6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GRNB and DFGP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023	0.82

The correlation between GRNB and DFGP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GRNB vs. DFGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNB

GRNB Risk / Return Rank: 47
GRNB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
GRNB Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
GRNB Omega Ratio Rank: 51
GRNB Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GRNB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

DFGP

DFGP Risk / Return Rank: 35
DFGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
DFGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
DFGP Omega Ratio Rank: 34
DFGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
DFGP Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNB vs. DFGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GRNB	DFGP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.30	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	1.87	+0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.23	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	1.59	+0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.82	5.41	+2.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GRNB vs. DFGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRNB Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the DFGP Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRNB and DFGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GRNB	DFGP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	1.30	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	1.44	-0.98

Drawdowns

GRNB vs. DFGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNB drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, which is greater than DFGP's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNB and DFGP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRNB	DFGP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.08%	-3.24%	-14.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.51%	-3.24%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-0.94%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-0.78%	-3.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.64%	0.95%	-0.31%

Volatility

GRNB vs. DFGP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) is 0.93%, while Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) has a volatility of 1.65%. This indicates that GRNB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRNB	DFGP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.93%	1.65%	-0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.34%	3.25%	-0.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.96%	3.96%	-1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.92%	4.66%	+0.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.88%	4.66%	+0.22%

GRNB vs. DFGP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRNB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DFGP's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GRNB vs. DFGP - Dividend Comparison

GRNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than DFGP's 3.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFGP Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF	3.64%	3.45%	4.51%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GRNB VanEck Green Bond ETF	4.24%	4.18%	3.83%	3.17%	2.60%	1.97%	2.24%	1.79%	1.21%	1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRNB and DFGP in my portfolio?

GRNB and DFGP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GRNB or DFGP?

DFGP has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to GRNB (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRNB dropped -18.08% vs DFGP's -3.24%.

Which ETF is better, GRNB or DFGP?

On 1-year performance, DFGP leads with 5.12% vs 4.99% for GRNB. On fees, GRNB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GRNB has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GRNB or DFGP?

Over the 1-year period, DFGP has performed better with a 5.12% return vs 4.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GRNB or DFGP?

GRNB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for DFGP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GRNB or DFGP?

GRNB has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 3.64% for DFGP.

What is the main difference between GRNB and DFGP?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GRNB and 0.22% for DFGP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GRNB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.