PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRNB vs. DAPP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GRNB vs. DAPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GRNB vs. DAPP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
-0.87%7.09%3.31%7.08%-11.93%-0.08%
DAPP
VanEck Digital Transformation ETF
-9.74%15.03%44.87%285.02%-85.60%-38.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNB achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly higher than DAPP's -9.74% return.


GRNB

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
-0.87%
6M
0.15%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*

DAPP

1D
6.88%
1M
-6.34%
YTD
-9.74%
6M
-31.40%
1Y
65.23%
3Y*
49.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GRNB vs. DAPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRNB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DAPP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GRNB vs. DAPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNB
GRNB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GRNB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRNB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRNB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GRNB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRNB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DAPP
DAPP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNB vs. DAPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRNBDAPPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

0.98

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

1.67

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.19

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.24

+0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.81

2.72

+4.09

GRNB vs. DAPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRNB Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the DAPP Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRNB and DAPP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRNBDAPPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

0.98

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

-0.17

+0.61

Correlation

The correlation between GRNB and DAPP is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GRNB vs. DAPP - Dividend Comparison

GRNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, while DAPP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
4.29%4.18%3.83%3.17%2.60%1.97%2.24%1.79%1.21%1.09%
DAPP
VanEck Digital Transformation ETF
0.00%0.00%4.04%0.00%0.00%10.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GRNB vs. DAPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNB drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, smaller than the maximum DAPP drawdown of -91.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNB and DAPP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GRNBDAPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.08%

-91.90%

+73.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-48.21%

+45.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-50.51%

+48.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-58.23%

+53.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

22.05%

-21.45%

Volatility

GRNB vs. DAPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) is 1.69%, while VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) has a volatility of 19.45%. This indicates that GRNB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GRNBDAPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

19.45%

-17.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

50.35%

-48.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51%

66.96%

-63.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.92%

73.29%

-68.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.91%

73.29%

-68.38%