GRNB vs. AVGB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GRNB (VanEck Green Bond ETF) and AVGB (Avantis Credit ETF) are both Global Bonds funds. GRNB is passively managed, while AVGB is actively managed. Over the past year, GRNB returned 4.68% vs 4.50% for AVGB. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GRNB charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for AVGB.

Performance

GRNB vs. AVGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNB achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than AVGB's 0.84% return.

GRNB

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 6M: 0.74%
• 1Y: 4.68%
• 3Y*: 5.08%
• 5Y*: 0.78%
• 10Y*: —

AVGB

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 0.84%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 4.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRNB vs. AVGB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GRNB VanEck Green Bond ETF	0.51%	5.58%
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF	0.84%	4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GRNB and AVGB is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025	0.82

The correlation between GRNB and AVGB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GRNB vs. AVGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNB

GRNB Risk / Return Rank: 46
GRNB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
GRNB Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
GRNB Omega Ratio Rank: 49
GRNB Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GRNB Martin Ratio Rank: 45

AVGB

AVGB Risk / Return Rank: 52
AVGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
AVGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AVGB Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AVGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
AVGB Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNB vs. AVGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) and Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GRNB	AVGB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	1.83	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	2.71	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.34	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	2.13	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.33	7.95	-0.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GRNB vs. AVGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRNB Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the AVGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRNB and AVGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GRNB	AVGB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.60	1.83	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	2.06	-1.60

Drawdowns

GRNB vs. AVGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNB drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, which is greater than AVGB's maximum drawdown of -2.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNB and AVGB.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRNB	AVGB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.08%	-2.12%	-15.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.51%	-2.12%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.37%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-0.33%	-4.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.64%	0.57%	+0.07%

Volatility

GRNB vs. AVGB - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) at 0.84%. This indicates that GRNB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRNB	AVGB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	0.84%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.35%	1.91%	+0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.96%	2.48%	+0.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.92%	2.48%	+2.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.88%	2.48%	+2.40%

GRNB vs. AVGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRNB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGB's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GRNB vs. AVGB - Dividend Comparison

GRNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than AVGB's 3.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF	3.46%	3.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GRNB VanEck Green Bond ETF	4.24%	4.18%	3.83%	3.17%	2.60%	1.97%	2.24%	1.79%	1.21%	1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRNB and AVGB in my portfolio?

GRNB and AVGB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GRNB or AVGB?

GRNB has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to AVGB (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRNB dropped -18.08% vs AVGB's -2.12%.

Which ETF is better, GRNB or AVGB?

On 1-year performance, GRNB leads with 4.68% vs 4.50% for AVGB. On fees, AVGB is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GRNB or AVGB?

Over the 1-year period, GRNB has performed better with a 4.68% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GRNB or AVGB?

AVGB is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GRNB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GRNB or AVGB?

GRNB has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 3.46% for AVGB.

What is the main difference between GRNB and AVGB?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GRNB and 0.19% for AVGB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.