GRN vs. STPZ
GRN (iPath Series B Carbon ETN) and STPZ (PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRN is a Commodities fund tracking the Barclays Global Carbon II Index, while STPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GRN returned 9.52%/yr vs 2.90%/yr for STPZ. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GRN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for STPZ.
Performance
GRN vs. STPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRN achieves a -8.60% return, which is significantly lower than STPZ's 1.79% return.
GRN
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 8.55%
- YTD
- -8.60%
- 6M
- -4.48%
- 1Y
- 9.03%
- 3Y*
- 0.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- —
STPZ
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 2.90%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
GRN vs. STPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRN iPath Series B Carbon ETN | -8.60% | 20.33% | -7.34% | -2.99% | -0.07% | 147.21% | 30.47% | -8.41% |
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 1.79% | 6.40% | 4.30% | 4.28% | -4.49% | 5.64% | 5.44% | 1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRN and STPZ is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019 | 0.03 |
The correlation between GRN and STPZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRN vs. STPZ — Risk / Return Rank
GRN
STPZ
GRN vs. STPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRN | STPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.49 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 4.87 | -4.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.77 | 16.28 | -15.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRN | STPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 2.49 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.89 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.90 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
GRN vs. STPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRN drawdown since its inception was -47.96%, which is greater than STPZ's maximum drawdown of -6.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRN and STPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRN | STPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.96% | -6.77% | -41.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.39% | -0.93% | -29.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.30% | -1.35% | -43.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.96% | -6.70% | -41.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -6.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.73% | -0.11% | -19.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.54% | -1.31% | -16.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.83% | 0.28% | +11.55% |
Volatility
GRN vs. STPZ - Volatility Comparison
iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) at 0.46%. This indicates that GRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRN | STPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 0.46% | +6.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.47% | 1.20% | +23.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.74% | 1.83% | +25.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.82% | 3.29% | +36.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.95% | 2.98% | +38.97% |
GRN vs. STPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than STPZ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRN vs. STPZ - Dividend Comparison
GRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRN iPath Series B Carbon ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 4.10% | 3.65% | 1.97% | 1.63% | 5.88% | 3.65% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.23% | 1.51% | 0.65% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRN and STPZ have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRN has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to STPZ (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRN dropped -47.96% vs STPZ's -6.77%.
On 5-year performance, GRN leads with 9.52% vs 2.90% for STPZ. On fees, STPZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, STPZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GRN has performed better with a 9.52% return vs 2.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STPZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRN.
STPZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 0.00% for GRN.
GRN is categorized as Commodities, while STPZ is Inflation-Protected Bonds. GRN tracks Barclays Global Carbon II Index, while STPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y). They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRN and 0.20% for STPZ.
STPZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRN and STPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer