PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRID vs. SWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRID vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GRID is traded in USD, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly higher than SWDA.L's 9.14% return. Over the past 10 years, GRID has outperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of 18.45%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.83% annualized return.


GRID

1D
-0.43%
1M
-8.67%
6M
11.72%
YTD
16.26%
1Y
25.15%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
14.88%
10Y*
18.45%
ALL TIME*
12.44%

SWDA.L

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.10%
6M
8.65%
YTD
9.14%
1Y
20.40%
3Y*
18.30%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
12.83%
ALL TIME*
7.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRID vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
16.26%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.14%21.14%19.09%23.79%-18.13%22.52%15.68%27.97%-9.23%22.42%

Correlation

The correlation between GRID and SWDA.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.61

The correlation between GRID and SWDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

GRID vs. SWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GRID
SWDA.L

Industrials

67.4%
11.1%

Utilities

17.3%
2.5%

Technology

11.6%
30.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%
8.9%

Energy

1.6%
3.8%

Basic Materials

0.0%
3.1%

Communication Services

-

8.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Financial Services

-

16.3%

Healthcare

-

8.9%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Industrials

GRID
67.4%
SWDA.L
11.1%

Utilities

GRID
17.3%
SWDA.L
2.5%

Technology

GRID
11.6%
SWDA.L
30.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GRID
3.6%
SWDA.L
8.9%

Energy

GRID
1.6%
SWDA.L
3.8%

Basic Materials

GRID
0.0%
SWDA.L
3.1%

Communication Services

GRID

-

SWDA.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

GRID

-

SWDA.L
4.9%

Financial Services

GRID

-

SWDA.L
16.3%

Healthcare

GRID

-

SWDA.L
8.9%

Real Estate

GRID

-

SWDA.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRID vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRID vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRIDSWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.31

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.36

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.50

10.05

-3.55

GRID vs. SWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRID Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRID and SWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRID vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -45.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and SWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRIDSWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-45.69%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-8.59%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.62%

-17.07%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-26.50%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-33.61%

-6.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.01%

-1.35%

-9.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-11.14%

+2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

2.03%

+1.85%

Volatility

GRID vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a higher volatility of 8.76% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 2.97%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRIDSWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.76%

2.97%

+5.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.36%

9.14%

+10.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.09%

11.71%

+10.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

15.31%

+6.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.72%

15.69%

+7.03%

GRID vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRID vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.81%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRID and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

GRID is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.20% for SWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRID and SWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer