GRID vs. RAYS
GRID (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index) and RAYS (Global X Solar ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - GRID tracks the NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index while RAYS tracks the Solactive Solar Index. Both are passively managed. GRID charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RAYS.
Performance
GRID vs. RAYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GRID
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 28.91%
- 6M
- 29.60%
- 1Y
- 51.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.27%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.76%
RAYS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRID vs. RAYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | 15.46% |
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% |
GRID vs. RAYS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GRID
RAYS
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
GRID
RAYS
Utilities
GRID
RAYS
Technology
GRID
RAYS
Consumer Cyclical
GRID
RAYS
Basic Materials
GRID
RAYS
Communication Services
GRID
-
RAYS
-
Consumer Defensive
GRID
-
RAYS
-
Energy
GRID
-
RAYS
-
Financial Services
GRID
-
RAYS
-
Healthcare
GRID
-
RAYS
-
Real Estate
GRID
-
RAYS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRID vs. RAYS — Risk / Return Rank
GRID
RAYS
GRID vs. RAYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) and Global X Solar ETF (RAYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRID | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.72 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRID | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | — | — |
Drawdowns
GRID vs. RAYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, which is greater than RAYS's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and RAYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRID | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | 0.00% | -40.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | 0.00% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.43% | 0.00% | -8.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | — | — |
Volatility
GRID vs. RAYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRID | RAYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.39% | 0.00% | +19.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.00% | 0.00% | +21.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.81% | 0.00% | +22.81% |
GRID vs. RAYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RAYS's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRID vs. RAYS - Dividend Comparison
GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while RAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | 0.77% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, RAYS is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RAYS is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.
GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for RAYS.
GRID tracks NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while RAYS tracks Solactive Solar Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.50% for RAYS.
Find the right allocation for GRID and RAYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer