PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRID vs. PRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRID vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 40.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GRID has outperformed PRN with an annualized return of 19.76%, while PRN has yielded a comparatively lower 18.49% annualized return.


GRID

1D
-0.18%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
23.59%
6M
24.02%
1Y
43.17%
3Y*
23.21%
5Y*
16.83%
10Y*
19.76%

PRN

1D
1.02%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
40.09%
6M
38.91%
1Y
62.65%
3Y*
34.70%
5Y*
20.00%
10Y*
18.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRID vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
23.59%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
40.09%13.74%30.35%37.96%-25.09%25.21%36.39%34.52%-16.19%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GRID and PRN is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.72

The correlation between GRID and PRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GRID vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GRID
PRN

Industrials

24.4%
80.0%

Technology

12.6%
18.6%

Utilities

3.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
1.2%

Energy

1.6%
1.6%

Basic Materials

0.0%
1.8%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

GRID
24.4%
PRN
80.0%

Technology

GRID
12.6%
PRN
18.6%

Utilities

GRID
3.9%
PRN

-

Consumer Cyclical

GRID
2.4%
PRN
1.2%

Energy

GRID
1.6%
PRN
1.6%

Basic Materials

GRID
0.0%
PRN
1.8%

Communication Services

GRID

-

PRN

-

Consumer Defensive

GRID

-

PRN

-

Financial Services

GRID

-

PRN
0.2%

Healthcare

GRID

-

PRN

-

Real Estate

GRID

-

PRN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRID vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

PRN
PRN Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRID vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRIDPRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

4.33

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.89

14.20

-1.31

GRID vs. PRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRID Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRID and PRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRID vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and PRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRIDPRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-59.88%

+19.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-14.15%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-30.78%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-34.84%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-36.27%

-4.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.40%

-1.81%

-3.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-10.83%

+2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

4.30%

-1.05%

Volatility

GRID vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) is 9.56%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 12.21%. This indicates that GRID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRIDPRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.56%

12.21%

-2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.70%

24.73%

-7.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.73%

30.02%

-9.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

25.33%

-4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.90%

24.33%

-1.43%

GRID vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRID vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than PRN's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.12%0.17%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.42%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRID and PRN have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRN has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to GRID (9.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs PRN's -59.88%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 19.76% vs 18.49% for PRN. On fees, PRN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GRID has been the lower-risk option at 9.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 19.76% return vs 18.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PRN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.12% for PRN.

GRID is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while PRN is Momentum. GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.60% for PRN.

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRID and PRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer