GRID vs. FDVV
GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GRID returned 16.83%/yr vs 13.53%/yr for FDVV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRID charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.
Performance
GRID vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRID achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 9.30% return.
GRID
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- 23.59%
- 6M
- 24.02%
- 1Y
- 43.17%
- 3Y*
- 23.21%
- 5Y*
- 16.83%
- 10Y*
- 19.76%
FDVV
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 23.92%
- 3Y*
- 19.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.53%
- 10Y*
- —
GRID vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 23.59% | 29.65% | 15.18% | 21.57% | -13.89% | 27.65% | 48.84% | 42.80% | -22.69% | 27.44% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 9.30% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRID and FDVV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.74 |
The correlation between GRID and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GRID vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GRID
FDVV
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
GRID
FDVV
Technology
GRID
FDVV
Utilities
GRID
FDVV
Consumer Cyclical
GRID
FDVV
Energy
GRID
FDVV
-
Basic Materials
GRID
FDVV
-
Communication Services
GRID
-
FDVV
Consumer Defensive
GRID
-
FDVV
Financial Services
GRID
-
FDVV
Healthcare
GRID
-
FDVV
Real Estate
GRID
-
FDVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRID vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
GRID
FDVV
GRID vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRID | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.41 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 2.44 | +1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.89 | 10.11 | +2.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRID vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRID drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, roughly equal to the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRID and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRID | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -40.25% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -9.30% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -15.90% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -20.18% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.40% | -0.29% | -5.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -3.80% | -4.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 2.24% | +1.01% |
Volatility
GRID vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.16%. This indicates that GRID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRID | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.56% | 3.16% | +6.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.70% | 8.16% | +9.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.73% | 10.12% | +10.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.24% | 14.76% | +6.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 16.98% | +5.92% |
GRID vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRID has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRID vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than FDVV's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.70% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 0.80% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRID and FDVV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRID has higher volatility (9.56%) compared to FDVV (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRID dropped -40.56% vs FDVV's -40.25%.
On 5-year performance, GRID leads with 16.83% vs 13.53% for FDVV. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GRID has performed better with a 16.83% return vs 13.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.
FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.80% for GRID.
GRID is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GRID and 0.29% for FDVV.
FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRID and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer