PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRHIX vs. FLOWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRHIX vs. FLOWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund (GRHIX) and Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRHIX achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly higher than FLOWX's 4.00% return.


GRHIX

1D
0.93%
1M
-6.72%
6M
-5.22%
YTD
4.53%
1Y
35.03%
3Y*
22.54%
5Y*
20.57%
10Y*

FLOWX

1D
0.73%
1M
3.15%
6M
0.84%
YTD
4.00%
1Y
9.77%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRHIX vs. FLOWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GRHIX
Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund
4.53%61.65%-1.51%16.61%16.38%62.15%54.26%
FLOWX
Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund
4.00%18.02%8.78%18.58%-19.94%28.52%35.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GRHIX and FLOWX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020

0.47

The correlation between GRHIX and FLOWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRHIX vs. FLOWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRHIX
GRHIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GRHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GRHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOWX
FLOWX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FLOWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOWX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOWX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRHIX vs. FLOWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund (GRHIX) and Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRHIXFLOWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.11

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

0.67

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.96

1.62

+3.34

GRHIX vs. FLOWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRHIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the FLOWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRHIX and FLOWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRHIX vs. FLOWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRHIX drawdown since its inception was -70.61%, which is greater than FLOWX's maximum drawdown of -30.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRHIX and FLOWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRHIXFLOWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.61%

-30.63%

-39.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.26%

-12.84%

-7.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.32%

-16.13%

-9.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.47%

-30.63%

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.32%

-6.82%

-10.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.19%

-7.39%

-10.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.85%

5.28%

+1.57%

Volatility

GRHIX vs. FLOWX - Volatility Comparison

Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund (GRHIX) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX) at 4.48%. This indicates that GRHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRHIXFLOWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

4.48%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.01%

11.92%

+7.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.35%

14.76%

+10.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.04%

17.90%

+11.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.44%

18.13%

+11.31%

GRHIX vs. FLOWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRHIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOWX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRHIX vs. FLOWX - Dividend Comparison

GRHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than FLOWX's 6.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLOWX
Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund
6.53%2.93%2.51%0.42%0.08%1.41%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GRHIX
Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund
3.25%3.39%4.02%3.19%1.21%3.25%2.03%0.57%1.18%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRHIX and FLOWX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRHIX has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to FLOWX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRHIX dropped -70.61% vs FLOWX's -30.63%.

GRHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRHIX and FLOWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer