PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRHAX vs. SDCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRHAX vs. SDCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund Retail Class (GRHAX) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRHAX achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly lower than SDCI's 28.73% return.


GRHAX

1D
0.95%
1M
-6.74%
6M
-5.34%
YTD
4.44%
1Y
34.74%
3Y*
22.16%
5Y*
20.31%
10Y*

SDCI

1D
0.00%
1M
5.31%
6M
21.72%
YTD
28.73%
1Y
34.42%
3Y*
21.58%
5Y*
20.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRHAX vs. SDCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GRHAX
Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund Retail Class
4.44%61.00%-1.71%16.19%16.43%61.61%-3.02%-0.29%-27.85%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
28.73%17.60%17.91%-0.88%33.23%36.52%-10.61%-2.36%-13.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GRHAX and SDCI is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2018

0.51

The correlation between GRHAX and SDCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRHAX vs. SDCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRHAX
GRHAX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GRHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GRHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SDCI
SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRHAX vs. SDCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund Retail Class (GRHAX) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRHAXSDCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

3.14

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.90

9.81

-4.91

GRHAX vs. SDCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRHAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the SDCI Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRHAX and SDCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRHAX vs. SDCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRHAX drawdown since its inception was -71.03%, which is greater than SDCI's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRHAX and SDCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRHAXSDCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.03%

-45.79%

-25.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.32%

-11.03%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.49%

-11.96%

-13.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.48%

-18.55%

-12.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.38%

-3.18%

-14.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.51%

-11.52%

-6.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.88%

3.52%

+3.36%

Volatility

GRHAX vs. SDCI - Volatility Comparison

Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund Retail Class (GRHAX) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) have volatilities of 5.50% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRHAXSDCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

5.31%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.02%

14.63%

+4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.43%

17.14%

+8.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.04%

18.43%

+10.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.46%

17.08%

+12.38%

GRHAX vs. SDCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRHAX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SDCI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRHAX vs. SDCI - Dividend Comparison

GRHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than SDCI's 2.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRHAX
Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund Retail Class
3.14%3.28%3.87%3.03%1.41%3.08%1.76%0.43%0.88%0.52%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
2.86%3.68%5.92%3.46%33.49%19.26%0.20%0.93%0.68%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRHAX and SDCI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRHAX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to SDCI (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRHAX dropped -71.03% vs SDCI's -45.79%.

SDCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRHAX and SDCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer