GREK vs. SETM

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

GREK (Global X MSCI Greece ETF) and SETM (Sprott Critical Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GREK is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while SETM is a Materials fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GREK returned 27.97%/yr vs 18.54%/yr for SETM. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GREK charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SETM.

Performance

GREK vs. SETM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GREK achieves a 14.15% return, which is significantly higher than SETM's -2.45% return.

GREK

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -2.53%
• 6M: 7.43%
• YTD: 14.15%
• 1Y: 25.52%
• 3Y*: 27.97%
• 5Y*: 27.03%
• 10Y*: 16.17%
• ALL TIME*: 5.76%

SETM

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -17.28%
• 6M: -19.37%
• YTD: -2.45%
• 1Y: 44.18%
• 3Y*: 18.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GREK vs. SETM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF	14.15%	76.11%	9.53%	23.40%
SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF	-2.45%	95.27%	-13.24%	-13.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GREK and SETM is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023	0.43

GREK vs. SETM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GREK	SETM
Financial Services	48.8%	-
Utilities	14.3%	-
Industrials	12.5%	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	-
Energy	6.8%	25.1%
Communication Services	4.1%	-
Basic Materials	3.0%	74.1%
Real Estate	1.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	0.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

GREK vs. SETM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GREK

GREK Risk / Return Rank: 37
GREK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
GREK Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
GREK Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GREK Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
GREK Martin Ratio Rank: 33

SETM

SETM Risk / Return Rank: 36
SETM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SETM Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
SETM Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SETM Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SETM Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GREK vs. SETM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GREK	SETM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	0.95	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	1.43	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.18	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	1.53	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.69	3.99	-0.30

GREK vs. SETM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GREK Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the SETM Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GREK and SETM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GREK vs. SETM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GREK drawdown since its inception was -79.50%, which is greater than SETM's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREK and SETM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GREK	SETM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.50%	-42.81%	-36.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.32%	-28.92%	+7.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.63%	-42.81%	+20.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.93%	-28.92%	+23.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.97%	-15.21%	-29.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.93%	11.09%	-4.16%

Volatility

GREK vs. SETM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) is 5.98%, while Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) has a volatility of 9.73%. This indicates that GREK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GREK	SETM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.98%	9.73%	-3.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.10%	37.09%	-15.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.36%	46.76%	-22.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.39%	37.18%	-12.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.85%	37.18%	-8.33%

GREK vs. SETM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GREK has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SETM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

GREK vs. SETM - Dividend Comparison

GREK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than SETM's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF	2.61%	3.46%	4.63%	2.61%	2.82%	2.16%	2.62%	2.25%	2.41%	2.13%	1.95%	1.52%
SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF	1.60%	1.56%	2.07%	2.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GREK and SETM in my portfolio?

GREK and SETM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GREK or SETM?

SETM has higher volatility (9.73%) compared to GREK (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREK dropped -79.50% vs SETM's -42.81%.

Which ETF is better, GREK or SETM?

On 3-year performance, GREK leads with 27.97% vs 18.54% for SETM. On fees, GREK is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, GREK has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GREK or SETM?

Over the 3-year period, GREK has performed better with a 27.97% return vs 18.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GREK or SETM?

GREK is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SETM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GREK or SETM?

GREK has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.60% for SETM.

What is the main difference between GREK and SETM?

GREK is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SETM is Materials. GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25-50, while SETM tracks Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for GREK and 0.65% for SETM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GREK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.