GREK vs. IEMG
GREK (Global X MSCI Greece ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - GREK tracks the MSCI All Greece Select 25/50 Index while IEMG tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GREK returned 17.36%/yr vs 8.84%/yr for IEMG. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GREK charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
GREK vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GREK achieves a 22.60% return, which is significantly higher than IEMG's 16.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GREK has outperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 17.36%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.84% annualized return.
GREK
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- YTD
- 22.60%
- 1Y
- 36.74%
- 3Y*
- 32.40%
- 5Y*
- 27.82%
- 10Y*
- 17.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.26%
IEMG
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- YTD
- 16.38%
- 1Y
- 32.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.46M | $9.35M | $7.83M | |
| $833.06M | $972.69M | $1.09B |
GREK vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 22.60% | 76.11% | 9.53% | 42.72% | 3.64% | 6.14% | -13.89% | 50.20% | -31.25% | 34.80% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 16.38% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 37.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between GREK and IEMG is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012 | 0.50 |
The correlation between GREK and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
GREK vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GREK
IEMG
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
GREK
IEMG
Utilities
GREK
IEMG
Industrials
GREK
IEMG
Consumer Cyclical
GREK
IEMG
Energy
GREK
IEMG
Communication Services
GREK
IEMG
Basic Materials
GREK
IEMG
Real Estate
GREK
IEMG
Consumer Defensive
GREK
IEMG
Healthcare
GREK
-
IEMG
Technology
GREK
-
IEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GREK vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
GREK
IEMG
GREK vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GREK | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.26 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 2.33 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | 7.16 | -1.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GREK vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GREK drawdown since its inception was -79.50%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREK and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GREK | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.50% | -38.71% | -40.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.32% | -13.78% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.32% | -17.21% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.46% | -33.61% | +3.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.04% | -38.71% | -18.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -9.76% | +9.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.86% | -12.89% | -31.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.92% | 4.47% | +2.45% |
Volatility
GREK vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) is 7.63%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that GREK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GREK | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.63% | 8.73% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.24% | 21.74% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.67% | 23.71% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.49% | 19.27% | +5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.85% | 20.32% | +8.53% |
GREK vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GREK has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GREK vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
GREK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than IEMG's 2.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 2.43% | 3.46% | 4.63% | 2.61% | 2.82% | 2.16% | 2.62% | 2.25% | 2.41% | 2.13% | 1.95% | 1.52% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.32% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GREK and IEMG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEMG has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to GREK (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREK dropped -79.50% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
On 10-year performance, GREK leads with 17.36% vs 8.84% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GREK has been the lower-risk option at 7.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GREK has performed better with a 17.36% return vs 8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for GREK.
GREK has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 2.32% for IEMG.
GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25/50 Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for GREK and 0.09% for IEMG.
GREK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GREK and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer