GRDX vs. NVGS
GRDX (GridAI Technologies Corp) and NVGS (Navigator Holdings Ltd.) are both stocks. GRDX operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while NVGS operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 5 years, GRDX returned -86.33%/yr vs 15.88%/yr for NVGS. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRDX vs. NVGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRDX achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly lower than NVGS's 20.16% return.
GRDX
- 1D
- 8.17%
- 1M
- -14.61%
- 6M
- -3.64%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 1Y
- 206.12%
- 3Y*
- -62.99%
- 5Y*
- -86.33%
- 10Y*
- —
NVGS
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- 6M
- 15.94%
- YTD
- 20.16%
- 1Y
- 35.03%
- 3Y*
- 16.64%
- 5Y*
- 15.88%
- 10Y*
- 6.64%
GRDX vs. NVGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRDX GridAI Technologies Corp | -3.43% | 149.73% | -85.19% | -96.57% | -97.98% | -85.10% | -6.73% | -14.05% | -66.73% | -23.27% |
NVGS Navigator Holdings Ltd. | 20.16% | 14.44% | 6.79% | 22.52% | 34.84% | -19.00% | -18.71% | 43.30% | -4.57% | 5.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRDX and NVGS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
GRDX:
$15.13M
NVGS:
$1.28B
GRDX:
-$4.01
NVGS:
$1.64
GRDX:
202.92
NVGS:
2.37
GRDX:
0.35
NVGS:
1.13
GRDX:
$36.25K
NVGS:
$576.17M
GRDX:
$0.00
NVGS:
$206.98M
GRDX:
-$7.19M
NVGS:
$287.24M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRDX vs. NVGS — Risk / Return Rank
GRDX
NVGS
GRDX vs. NVGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GridAI Technologies Corp (GRDX) and Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRDX | NVGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.23 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 1.61 | +1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.40 | 5.65 | -0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRDX vs. NVGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRDX drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than NVGS's maximum drawdown of -87.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRDX and NVGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRDX | NVGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -87.68% | -12.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.39% | -23.12% | -41.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.75% | -38.88% | -59.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -100.00% | -38.88% | -61.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -31.69% | -68.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.99% | -43.96% | -36.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.73% | 6.58% | +32.15% |
Volatility
GRDX vs. NVGS - Volatility Comparison
GridAI Technologies Corp (GRDX) has a higher volatility of 25.84% compared to Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) at 12.05%. This indicates that GRDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRDX | NVGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.84% | 12.05% | +13.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 83.06% | 24.48% | +58.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.36% | 29.28% | +119.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 140.53% | 35.88% | +104.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 118.42% | 47.62% | +70.80% |
Dividends
GRDX vs. NVGS - Dividend Comparison
GRDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GRDX GridAI Technologies Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVGS Navigator Holdings Ltd. | 1.26% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 0.69% |
Financials
GRDX vs. NVGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GridAI Technologies Corp and Navigator Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GRDX and NVGS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRDX has higher volatility (25.84%) compared to NVGS (12.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRDX dropped -100.00% vs NVGS's -87.68%.
GRDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRDX and NVGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer