PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRDX vs. BTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GRDX vs. BTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GridAI Technologies Corp (GRDX) and Baytex Energy Corp (BTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRDX achieves a -12.66% return, which is significantly lower than BTE's 31.31% return.


GRDX

1D
-9.56%
1M
-22.77%
6M
0.49%
YTD
-12.66%
1Y
176.87%
3Y*
-58.51%
5Y*
-86.48%
10Y*

BTE

1D
3.44%
1M
-8.95%
6M
25.12%
YTD
31.31%
1Y
123.63%
3Y*
9.50%
5Y*
19.74%
10Y*
-2.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRDX vs. BTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRDX
GridAI Technologies Corp
-12.66%149.73%-85.19%-96.57%-97.98%-85.10%-6.73%-14.05%-66.73%-23.27%
BTE
Baytex Energy Corp
31.31%28.83%-20.55%-25.70%45.95%476.49%-63.03%-17.61%-41.33%-38.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GRDX and BTE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016

0.07

The correlation between GRDX and BTE shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GRDX:

$13.68M

BTE:

$3.00B

EPS

GRDX:

-$4.01

BTE:

-CA$0.97

PS Ratio

GRDX:

183.53

BTE:

8.59

PB Ratio

GRDX:

0.31

BTE:

2.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRDX:

$36.25K

BTE:

CA$528.79M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRDX:

$0.00

BTE:

-CA$81.49M

EBITDA (TTM)

GRDX:

-$7.19M

BTE:

CA$388.25M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRDX vs. BTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRDX
GRDX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BTE
BTE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRDX vs. BTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GridAI Technologies Corp (GRDX) and Baytex Energy Corp (BTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRDXBTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

4.54

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

14.75

-10.18

GRDX vs. BTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the BTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRDX and BTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRDX vs. BTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRDX drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum BTE drawdown of -99.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRDX and BTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRDXBTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-99.55%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.39%

-27.38%

-37.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.75%

-66.67%

-32.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-100.00%

-78.29%

-21.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-90.31%

-9.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.00%

-60.84%

-19.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.81%

8.42%

+30.39%

Volatility

GRDX vs. BTE - Volatility Comparison

GridAI Technologies Corp (GRDX) has a higher volatility of 26.00% compared to Baytex Energy Corp (BTE) at 12.00%. This indicates that GRDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRDXBTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.00%

12.00%

+14.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

83.21%

30.17%

+53.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

148.52%

46.21%

+102.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

140.63%

54.23%

+86.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

118.44%

65.39%

+53.05%

Dividends

GRDX vs. BTE - Dividend Comparison

GRDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTE
Baytex Energy Corp
1.53%2.03%2.56%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%24.69%
GRDX
GridAI Technologies Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GRDX vs. BTE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GridAI Technologies Corp and Baytex Energy Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-1.00B-500.00M0.00500.00M1.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
36.25K
402.40M
(GRDX) Total Revenue
(BTE) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GRDX values in USD, BTE values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


GRDX and BTE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRDX has higher volatility (26.00%) compared to BTE (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRDX dropped -100.00% vs BTE's -99.55%.

BTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRDX and BTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer