PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTE vs. REI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BTE vs. REI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baytex Energy Corp (BTE) and Ring Energy, Inc. (REI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTE achieves a 27.57% return, which is significantly lower than REI's 29.89% return. Over the past 10 years, BTE has outperformed REI with an annualized return of -2.15%, while REI has yielded a comparatively lower -19.21% annualized return.


BTE

1D
1.49%
1M
-20.31%
YTD
27.57%
6M
30.40%
1Y
123.07%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
17.21%
10Y*
-2.15%

REI

1D
0.00%
1M
-18.12%
YTD
29.89%
6M
30.03%
1Y
43.84%
3Y*
-13.07%
5Y*
-17.63%
10Y*
-19.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTE vs. REI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTE
Baytex Energy Corp
27.57%28.83%-20.55%-25.70%45.95%476.49%-63.03%-17.61%-41.33%-38.52%
REI
Ring Energy, Inc.
29.89%-36.03%-6.85%-40.65%7.89%245.51%-75.00%-48.03%-63.45%7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BTE and REI is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

0.42

The correlation between BTE and REI shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BTE:

-CA$0.97

REI:

-$1.70

PS Ratio

BTE:

8.41

REI:

0.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

BTE:

CA$528.79M

REI:

$228.09M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BTE:

-CA$81.49M

REI:

$155.05M

EBITDA (TTM)

BTE:

CA$388.25M

REI:

-$65.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTE vs. REI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTE
BTE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

REI
REI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
REI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
REI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
REI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
REI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTE vs. REI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baytex Energy Corp (BTE) and Ring Energy, Inc. (REI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTEREIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.17

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.97

1.01

+3.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.50

2.69

+16.81

BTE vs. REI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the REI Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTE and REI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTE vs. REI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTE drawdown since its inception was -99.55%, roughly equal to the maximum REI drawdown of -97.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTE and REI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTEREIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.55%

-97.68%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.93%

-43.43%

+18.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.67%

-69.90%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.29%

-85.32%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.53%

-97.24%

+0.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.59%

-94.45%

+3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.76%

-69.66%

+8.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.35%

16.32%

-9.97%

Volatility

BTE vs. REI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baytex Energy Corp (BTE) is 13.33%, while Ring Energy, Inc. (REI) has a volatility of 15.63%. This indicates that BTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTEREIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.33%

15.63%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.23%

56.45%

-26.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.50%

66.84%

-19.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.27%

62.40%

-8.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.57%

74.22%

-8.65%

Dividends

BTE vs. REI - Dividend Comparison

BTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while REI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTE
Baytex Energy Corp
1.58%2.03%2.56%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%24.69%
REI
Ring Energy, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BTE vs. REI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Baytex Energy Corp and Ring Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-1.00B-500.00M0.00500.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
402.40M
0
(BTE) Total Revenue
(REI) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BTE values in CAD, REI values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BTE and REI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REI has higher volatility (15.63%) compared to BTE (13.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTE dropped -99.55% vs REI's -97.68%.

BTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTE and REI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer