GRC vs. SWK
GRC (The Gorman-Rupp Company) and SWK (Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — GRC in Specialty Industrial Machinery, SWK in Tools & Accessories. Over the past 10 years, GRC returned 13.23%/yr vs -0.11%/yr for SWK. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRC vs. SWK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRC achieves a 67.38% return, which is significantly higher than SWK's 21.37% return. Over the past 10 years, GRC has outperformed SWK with an annualized return of 13.23%, while SWK has yielded a comparatively lower -0.11% annualized return.
GRC
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- 6M
- 57.77%
- YTD
- 67.38%
- 1Y
- 114.11%
- 3Y*
- 44.21%
- 5Y*
- 20.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
SWK
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 6.12%
- 6M
- 9.47%
- YTD
- 21.37%
- 1Y
- 26.58%
- 3Y*
- 0.78%
- 5Y*
- -12.73%
- 10Y*
- -0.11%
GRC vs. SWK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 67.38% | 28.24% | 8.87% | 42.15% | -41.17% | 39.71% | -11.90% | 17.64% | 11.75% | 2.49% |
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 21.37% | -3.17% | -15.19% | 35.55% | -58.92% | 7.28% | 9.73% | 41.18% | -28.13% | 50.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRC and SWK is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, GRC and SWK have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
GRC:
$2.10B
SWK:
$13.71B
GRC:
$2.23
SWK:
$2.64
GRC:
35.61
SWK:
33.38
GRC:
3.01
SWK:
0.89
GRC:
$695.03M
SWK:
$15.13B
GRC:
$210.01M
SWK:
$4.52B
GRC:
$118.94M
SWK:
$1.39B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRC vs. SWK — Risk / Return Rank
GRC
SWK
GRC vs. SWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRC | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.14 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.50 | 0.96 | +6.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.51 | 2.12 | +20.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRC vs. SWK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRC drawdown since its inception was -67.23%, smaller than the maximum SWK drawdown of -71.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRC and SWK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRC | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.23% | -71.31% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -26.14% | +11.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.87% | -48.31% | +21.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.26% | -69.52% | +20.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.26% | -71.31% | +22.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.34% | -52.01% | +38.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.60% | -19.52% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.97% | 11.80% | -6.83% |
Volatility
GRC vs. SWK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) is 13.36%, while Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) has a volatility of 14.36%. This indicates that GRC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRC | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.36% | 14.36% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.14% | 28.60% | +1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.09% | 38.83% | -2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.08% | 38.03% | -6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.08% | 36.78% | -2.70% |
Dividends
GRC vs. SWK - Dividend Comparison
GRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than SWK's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 0.95% | 1.56% | 1.91% | 1.98% | 2.67% | 1.43% | 1.82% | 1.47% | 7.74% | 1.51% | 1.39% | 1.52% |
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 3.76% | 4.44% | 4.06% | 3.28% | 4.23% | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 1.43% | 1.97% | 2.01% |
Financials
GRC vs. SWK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Gorman-Rupp Company and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GRC vs. SWK - Profitability Comparison
GRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a gross profit of 57.36M and revenue of 176.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.
SWK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 3.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.2%.
GRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported an operating income of 27.48M and revenue of 176.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
SWK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported an operating income of 366.80M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
GRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a net income of 17.84M and revenue of 176.59M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.
SWK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a net income of 158.20M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRC and SWK have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWK has higher volatility (14.36%) compared to GRC (13.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRC dropped -67.23% vs SWK's -71.31%.
GRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRC and SWK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer