GRAB vs. NVDA
GRAB (Grab Holdings Limited) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. GRAB operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 5 years, GRAB returned -22.42%/yr vs 63.13%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRAB vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRAB achieves a -33.87% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.16% return.
GRAB
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- YTD
- -33.87%
- 6M
- -35.92%
- 1Y
- -27.79%
- 3Y*
- -1.47%
- 5Y*
- -22.42%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDA
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -12.86%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 17.38%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 71.13%
- 5Y*
- 63.13%
- 10Y*
- 67.95%
GRAB vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRAB Grab Holdings Limited | -33.87% | 5.72% | 40.06% | 4.66% | -54.84% | -44.56% | 8.16% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 10.16% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | -2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRAB and NVDA is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2020 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
GRAB:
$14.66B
NVDA:
$5.00T
GRAB:
$0.09
NVDA:
$6.53
GRAB:
37.65
NVDA:
31.44
GRAB:
4.02
NVDA:
19.80
GRAB:
2.25
NVDA:
25.60
GRAB:
$3.55B
NVDA:
$253.49B
GRAB:
$1.55B
NVDA:
$187.95B
GRAB:
$481.00M
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRAB vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
GRAB
NVDA
GRAB vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRAB | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.21 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 2.07 | -2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 4.94 | -6.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRAB vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRAB drawdown since its inception was -86.46%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRAB and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRAB | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.46% | -89.72% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.30% | -20.21% | -29.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.30% | -36.88% | -12.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.46% | -66.34% | -20.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.66% | -12.86% | -67.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.34% | -36.18% | -31.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.32% | 8.46% | +18.86% |
Volatility
GRAB vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) is 8.97%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that GRAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRAB | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.97% | 13.26% | -4.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.51% | 26.67% | -2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.80% | 35.00% | +2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.83% | 51.76% | +8.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.44% | 49.84% | +10.60% |
Dividends
GRAB vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
GRAB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRAB Grab Holdings Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Financials
GRAB vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grab Holdings Limited and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GRAB vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
GRAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 414.00M and revenue of 955.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.4%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
GRAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 75.00M and revenue of 955.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
GRAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported a net income of 136.00M and revenue of 955.00M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRAB and NVDA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to GRAB (8.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRAB dropped -86.46% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRAB and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer