GQRPX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
GQRPX is managed by GQG Partners. It was launched on Mar 28, 2019. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
GQRPX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GQRPX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQRPX GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund | 7.78% | 0.67% | 19.98% | 19.56% | -3.77% | 16.94% | 14.55% | 12.70% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 10.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQRPX achieves a 7.78% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 9.35% return.
GQRPX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- 7.78%
- 6M
- 7.06%
- 1Y
- 7.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 18.42%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- 7.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GQRPX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQRPX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GQRPX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
GQRPX
CSUAX
GQRPX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GQRPX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.66 | 1.68 | -1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 2.23 | -1.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.33 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 2.45 | -1.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.32 | 10.62 | -7.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQRPX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 1.68 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.62 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.55 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between GQRPX and CSUAX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GQRPX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
GQRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, less than CSUAX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQRPX GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund | 7.05% | 7.60% | 6.35% | 1.22% | 2.93% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.39% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
GQRPX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQRPX drawdown since its inception was -28.88%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQRPX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQRPX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.88% | -52.20% | +23.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.84% | -7.98% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -20.45% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -3.50% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -8.49% | +3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 1.84% | +0.72% |
Volatility
GQRPX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX) is 3.07%, while Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that GQRPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GQRPX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 3.44% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.72% | 6.89% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 11.49% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 12.89% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 14.89% | +2.52% |