GQRE vs. REET
GQRE (FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund) and REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - GQRE tracks the Northern Trust Global Quality Real Estate (NR) while REET tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GQRE returned 3.85%/yr vs 4.13%/yr for REET. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GQRE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for REET.
Performance
GQRE vs. REET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQRE achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly lower than REET's 9.19% return. Over the past 10 years, GQRE has underperformed REET with an annualized return of 3.85%, while REET has yielded a comparatively higher 4.13% annualized return.
GQRE
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 12.75%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 3.85%
REET
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 13.23%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- 2.43%
- 10Y*
- 4.13%
GQRE vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQRE FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund | 8.29% | 8.27% | 6.09% | 9.21% | -27.22% | 32.01% | -9.17% | 21.84% | -8.88% | 13.60% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 9.19% | 7.97% | 2.65% | 10.28% | -24.10% | 32.43% | -10.48% | 24.42% | -5.27% | 7.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GQRE and REET is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2014 | 0.94 |
The correlation between GQRE and REET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
GQRE vs. REET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GQRE
REET
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
GQRE
REET
Financial Services
GQRE
REET
Consumer Cyclical
GQRE
REET
-
Technology
GQRE
REET
-
Healthcare
GQRE
REET
-
Consumer Defensive
GQRE
REET
-
Utilities
GQRE
REET
-
Communication Services
GQRE
REET
-
Industrials
GQRE
REET
-
Basic Materials
GQRE
REET
-
Energy
GQRE
-
REET
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GQRE vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank
GQRE
REET
GQRE vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GQRE | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.47 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | 5.28 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQRE | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.10 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.14 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.25 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
GQRE vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQRE drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum REET drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQRE and REET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQRE | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.87% | -44.59% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | -9.04% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.17% | -18.02% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.08% | -32.11% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.87% | -44.59% | +2.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -1.81% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.23% | -9.78% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 2.51% | +0.15% |
Volatility
GQRE vs. REET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) is 3.56%, while iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that GQRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GQRE | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 3.90% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 8.86% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.66% | 12.12% | -0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 16.96% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 18.84% | -1.18% |
GQRE vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQRE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
GQRE vs. REET - Dividend Comparison
GQRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than REET's 3.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQRE FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund | 4.32% | 4.75% | 3.77% | 2.91% | 2.56% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 4.29% | 3.22% | 1.97% | 4.16% | 2.32% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.39% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, GQRE and REET move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
REET has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to GQRE (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQRE dropped -41.87% vs REET's -44.59%.
On 10-year performance, REET leads with 4.13% vs 3.85% for GQRE. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, GQRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, REET has performed better with a 4.13% return vs 3.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GQRE.
GQRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 3.39% for REET.
GQRE tracks Northern Trust Global Quality Real Estate (NR), while REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GQRE and 0.14% for REET.
GQRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GQRE and REET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer