PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQRE vs. ESG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQRE vs. ESG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) and FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GQRE having a 9.74% return and ESG slightly higher at 9.84%.


GQRE

1D
0.38%
1M
0.22%
YTD
9.74%
6M
9.63%
1Y
11.61%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*
4.14%

ESG

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.46%
YTD
9.84%
6M
8.58%
1Y
20.61%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQRE vs. ESG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GQRE
FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund
9.74%8.27%6.09%9.21%-27.22%32.01%-9.17%21.84%-8.88%13.60%
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
9.84%16.04%20.22%27.86%-19.89%28.48%20.75%31.74%-5.17%22.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GQRE and ESG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2016

0.58

The correlation between GQRE and ESG shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQRE vs. ESG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQRE
GQRE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GQRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

ESG
ESG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ESG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ESG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQRE vs. ESG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) and FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GQREESGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.32

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

2.39

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.32

10.00

-5.68

GQRE vs. ESG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQRE Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the ESG Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQRE and ESG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GQRE vs. ESG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQRE drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than ESG's maximum drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQRE and ESG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQREESGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-32.53%

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-8.68%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.17%

-18.32%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.08%

-26.04%

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-2.55%

+1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-5.05%

-4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.07%

+0.63%

Volatility

GQRE vs. ESG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) is 3.71%, while FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that GQRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQREESGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

4.36%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

9.24%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

11.56%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

16.81%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

18.35%

-0.71%

GQRE vs. ESG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQRE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ESG's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQRE vs. ESG - Dividend Comparison

GQRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than ESG's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
0.89%0.96%1.18%1.10%1.38%1.03%1.33%1.51%1.72%1.52%0.92%0.00%
GQRE
FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund
4.28%4.75%3.77%2.91%2.56%2.36%2.05%4.29%3.22%1.97%4.16%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQRE and ESG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESG has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to GQRE (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQRE dropped -41.87% vs ESG's -32.53%.

On 5-year performance, ESG leads with 11.91% vs 2.31% for GQRE. On fees, ESG is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, GQRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESG has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 2.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESG is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GQRE.

GQRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 0.89% for ESG.

GQRE is categorized as REIT, while ESG is Large Cap Growth Equities. GQRE tracks Northern Trust Global Quality Real Estate (NR), while ESG tracks STOXX USA ESG Select KPIs Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GQRE and 0.32% for ESG.

ESG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQRE and ESG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer