GQQQ vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GQQQ (Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GQQQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

GQQQ vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GQQQ

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 6.40%
• YTD: 21.09%
• 6M: 20.15%
• 1Y: 40.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQQQ vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF	0.38%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GQQQ and GRW is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.10

Return for Risk

GQQQ vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQQQ

GQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 78
GQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
GQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
GQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
GQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQQQ vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GQQQ	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.67	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.41	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GQQQ	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.26	13.58	-12.32

Drawdowns

GQQQ vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQQQ drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQQQ and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQQQ	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.36%	-0.45%	-21.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-0.27%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.11%	-0.17%	-2.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GQQQ	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.45%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.65%	8.89%	+6.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.20%	8.89%	+11.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.20%	8.89%	+11.31%

GQQQ vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQQQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQQQ vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

GQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GQQQ Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF	0.40%	0.46%	0.11%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQQQ and GRW in my portfolio?

GQQQ and GRW have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GQQQ or GRW?

On fees, GQQQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GQQQ or GRW?

GQQQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GQQQ or GRW?

GQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between GQQQ and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Astoria and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GQQQ and 0.75% for GRW.