PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQLVX vs. AVERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQLVX vs. AVERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Value Equity Portfolio (GQLVX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQLVX achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly lower than AVERX's 17.13% return.


GQLVX

1D
0.81%
1M
3.27%
YTD
12.35%
6M
13.83%
1Y
27.82%
3Y*
16.42%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*

AVERX

1D
0.60%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
17.13%
6M
16.12%
1Y
16.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQLVX vs. AVERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GQLVX and AVERX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.59

The correlation between GQLVX and AVERX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQLVX vs. AVERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQLVX
GQLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GQLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GQLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AVERX
AVERX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
AVERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVERX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
AVERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVERX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQLVX vs. AVERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Value Equity Portfolio (GQLVX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GQLVXAVERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.17

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

1.72

+2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.55

4.09

+12.45

GQLVX vs. AVERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the AVERX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQLVX and AVERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GQLVXAVERXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

0.93

+1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.85

-0.42

Drawdowns

GQLVX vs. AVERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQLVX drawdown since its inception was -42.79%, which is greater than AVERX's maximum drawdown of -11.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQLVX and AVERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQLVXAVERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.79%

-11.33%

-31.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.73%

-10.27%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.88%

+8.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.07%

-5.73%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

4.32%

-2.57%

Volatility

GQLVX vs. AVERX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Value Equity Portfolio (GQLVX) is 2.87%, while Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that GQLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQLVXAVERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

4.32%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

14.70%

-6.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

19.00%

-7.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.52%

18.86%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

18.86%

+2.11%

GQLVX vs. AVERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQLVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AVERX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQLVX vs. AVERX - Dividend Comparison

GQLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, more than AVERX's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVERX
Ave Maria Value Focused Fund
0.35%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GQLVX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Value Equity Portfolio
7.16%7.91%13.45%2.41%6.06%1.34%1.88%1.71%2.12%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQLVX and AVERX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVERX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to GQLVX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQLVX dropped -42.79% vs AVERX's -11.33%.

GQLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQLVX and AVERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer