GQLVX vs. AVERX
GQLVX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Value Equity Portfolio) and AVERX (Ave Maria Value Focused Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past year, GQLVX returned 27.82% vs 16.66% for AVERX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GQLVX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for AVERX.
Performance
GQLVX vs. AVERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQLVX achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly lower than AVERX's 17.13% return.
GQLVX
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 12.35%
- 6M
- 13.83%
- 1Y
- 27.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- —
AVERX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- 1Y
- 16.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GQLVX vs. AVERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GQLVX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Value Equity Portfolio | 12.35% | 19.78% |
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund | 17.13% | 0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between GQLVX and AVERX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.59 |
The correlation between GQLVX and AVERX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GQLVX vs. AVERX — Risk / Return Rank
GQLVX
AVERX
GQLVX vs. AVERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Value Equity Portfolio (GQLVX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GQLVX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.17 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 1.72 | +2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.55 | 4.09 | +12.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQLVX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 0.93 | +1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.85 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
GQLVX vs. AVERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQLVX drawdown since its inception was -42.79%, which is greater than AVERX's maximum drawdown of -11.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQLVX and AVERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQLVX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.79% | -11.33% | -31.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.73% | -10.27% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.88% | +8.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -5.73% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 4.32% | -2.57% |
Volatility
GQLVX vs. AVERX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Value Equity Portfolio (GQLVX) is 2.87%, while Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that GQLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GQLVX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 4.32% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 14.70% | -6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 19.00% | -7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 18.86% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 18.86% | +2.11% |
GQLVX vs. AVERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQLVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AVERX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
GQLVX vs. AVERX - Dividend Comparison
GQLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, more than AVERX's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund | 0.35% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GQLVX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Value Equity Portfolio | 7.16% | 7.91% | 13.45% | 2.41% | 6.06% | 1.34% | 1.88% | 1.71% | 2.12% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GQLVX and AVERX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVERX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to GQLVX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQLVX dropped -42.79% vs AVERX's -11.33%.
GQLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GQLVX and AVERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer