PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQLVX vs. GQETX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQLVX vs. GQETX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Value Equity Portfolio (GQLVX) and GMO Quality Fund (GQETX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQLVX achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly higher than GQETX's 3.91% return.


GQLVX

1D
0.27%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
10.76%
6M
9.94%
1Y
24.53%
3Y*
15.77%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*

GQETX

1D
-0.60%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
3.91%
6M
3.62%
1Y
19.59%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
16.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQLVX vs. GQETX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GQLVX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Value Equity Portfolio
10.76%14.97%10.92%9.13%-6.38%29.26%-1.79%27.33%-14.03%0.87%
GQETX
GMO Quality Fund
3.91%19.61%17.76%28.94%-15.33%31.67%18.33%31.77%0.50%-0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GQLVX and GQETX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2017

0.78

The correlation between GQLVX and GQETX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (3 years) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQLVX vs. GQETX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQLVX
GQLVX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GQLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
GQLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

GQETX
GQETX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GQETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQETX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GQETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQETX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQLVX vs. GQETX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Value Equity Portfolio (GQLVX) and GMO Quality Fund (GQETX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GQLVXGQETXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.28

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

1.63

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.28

6.42

+7.85

GQLVX vs. GQETX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the GQETX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQLVX and GQETX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GQLVX vs. GQETX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQLVX drawdown since its inception was -42.79%, which is greater than GQETX's maximum drawdown of -39.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQLVX and GQETX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQLVXGQETXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.79%

-39.99%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.73%

-12.76%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.16%

-15.54%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.16%

-24.22%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-2.05%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-4.99%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

3.23%

-1.45%

Volatility

GQLVX vs. GQETX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Value Equity Portfolio (GQLVX) is 3.79%, while GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that GQLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQETX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQLVXGQETXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

4.18%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.60%

10.08%

-1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.21%

12.68%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

15.93%

+1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

17.10%

+3.84%

GQLVX vs. GQETX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQLVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GQETX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQLVX vs. GQETX - Dividend Comparison

GQLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%, less than GQETX's 10.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQETX
GMO Quality Fund
10.74%11.16%3.91%3.43%11.85%10.19%13.61%8.08%21.66%8.10%3.56%17.25%
GQLVX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Value Equity Portfolio
7.26%7.91%13.45%2.41%6.06%1.34%1.88%1.71%2.12%0.21%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQLVX and GQETX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GQETX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to GQLVX (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQLVX dropped -42.79% vs GQETX's -39.99%.

GQLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQLVX and GQETX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer