GQGU vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GQGU charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

GQGU vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GQGU

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 6.60%
• 6M: 7.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQGU vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	-0.30%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GQGU and GRW is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.80

Return for Risk

GQGU vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GQGU	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	14.00	-13.40

Drawdowns

GQGU vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQGU drawdown since its inception was -6.65%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGU and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQGU	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.65%	-0.45%	-6.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.66%	-0.45%	-4.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.54%	-0.14%	-2.40%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GQGU	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.14%	10.19%	-0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.14%	10.19%	-0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.14%	10.19%	-0.05%

GQGU vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQGU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQGU vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	0.96%	1.02%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQGU and GRW in my portfolio?

GQGU and GRW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GQGU or GRW?

On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GQGU or GRW?

GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GQGU or GRW?

GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between GQGU and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: GQG Partners and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GQGU and 0.75% for GRW.