PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQGPX vs. FQEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQGPX vs. FQEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQGPX achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly lower than FQEMX's 90.39% return.


GQGPX

1D
1.28%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
7.63%
6M
8.05%
1Y
15.72%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*

FQEMX

1D
0.04%
1M
29.89%
YTD
90.39%
6M
100.76%
1Y
170.59%
3Y*
48.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQGPX vs. FQEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GQGPX
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund
7.63%9.67%6.00%28.47%-21.01%-4.23%
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
90.39%55.98%6.67%12.18%-20.68%0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between GQGPX and FQEMX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021

0.68

The correlation between GQGPX and FQEMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQGPX vs. FQEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQGPX
GQGPX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GQGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GQGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FQEMX
FQEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FQEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FQEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQGPX vs. FQEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GQGPXFQEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

2.03

-0.78

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

9.27

-7.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.73

36.36

-30.63

GQGPX vs. FQEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQGPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the FQEMX Sharpe Ratio of 6.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQGPX and FQEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GQGPXFQEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

6.33

-4.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.21

-0.66

Drawdowns

GQGPX vs. FQEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQGPX drawdown since its inception was -33.68%, roughly equal to the maximum FQEMX drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGPX and FQEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQGPXFQEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.68%

-34.46%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-18.93%

+9.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.83%

-18.93%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

0.00%

-3.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.53%

-10.78%

-0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

4.78%

-2.09%

Volatility

GQGPX vs. FQEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GQGPX) is 3.31%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) has a volatility of 13.31%. This indicates that GQGPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQGPXFQEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

13.31%

-10.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

24.44%

-14.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.32%

27.74%

-16.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.68%

21.09%

-6.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.92%

21.09%

-5.17%

GQGPX vs. FQEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQGPX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FQEMX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQGPX vs. FQEMX - Dividend Comparison

GQGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than FQEMX's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
1.67%3.18%3.15%4.82%3.93%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GQGPX
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund
1.78%1.91%1.50%2.54%5.52%3.78%0.15%1.06%0.59%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQGPX and FQEMX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQEMX has higher volatility (13.31%) compared to GQGPX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQGPX dropped -33.68% vs FQEMX's -34.46%.

FQEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQGPX and FQEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer