PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQFPX vs. GMGEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQFPX vs. GMGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) and GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQFPX achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than GMGEX's 19.27% return.


GQFPX

1D
-1.06%
1M
-3.67%
YTD
7.65%
6M
7.70%
1Y
15.46%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
10Y*

GMGEX

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.86%
YTD
19.27%
6M
21.08%
1Y
41.55%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQFPX vs. GMGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
7.65%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%
GMGEX
GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund
19.27%29.14%4.12%22.27%-17.07%0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GQFPX and GMGEX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between GQFPX and GMGEX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQFPX vs. GMGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

GMGEX
GMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQFPX vs. GMGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) and GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GQFPXGMGEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.60

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

4.54

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.90

18.01

-10.12

GQFPX vs. GMGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQFPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the GMGEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQFPX and GMGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GQFPXGMGEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

3.31

-1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.25

+0.55

Drawdowns

GQFPX vs. GMGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQFPX drawdown since its inception was -16.95%, smaller than the maximum GMGEX drawdown of -58.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQFPX and GMGEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQFPXGMGEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.95%

-58.47%

+41.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.24%

-9.24%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.57%

-17.12%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.95%

-0.48%

-4.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-16.75%

+13.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

2.32%

-0.47%

Volatility

GQFPX vs. GMGEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) is 3.32%, while GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that GQFPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQFPXGMGEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

4.01%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

9.91%

-2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.52%

12.66%

-3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.83%

14.81%

-1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.83%

16.06%

-3.23%

GQFPX vs. GMGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQFPX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than GMGEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQFPX vs. GMGEX - Dividend Comparison

GQFPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than GMGEX's 3.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMGEX
GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund
3.93%4.69%0.29%5.62%7.81%7.76%3.83%3.14%3.14%2.90%3.71%4.20%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
5.93%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQFPX and GMGEX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMGEX has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to GQFPX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQFPX dropped -16.95% vs GMGEX's -58.47%.

GMGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQFPX and GMGEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer