GQFPX vs. GAPIX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

GQFPX (GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund) and GAPIX (Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, GQFPX returned 13.69%/yr vs 21.82%/yr for GAPIX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GQFPX charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for GAPIX.

Performance

GQFPX vs. GAPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQFPX achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than GAPIX's 9.72% return.

GQFPX

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -3.33%
• YTD: 7.16%
• 6M: 7.45%
• 1Y: 14.65%
• 3Y*: 13.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GAPIX

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -1.63%
• YTD: 9.72%
• 6M: 8.72%
• 1Y: 25.16%
• 3Y*: 21.82%
• 5Y*: 11.29%
• 10Y*: 13.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQFPX vs. GAPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	7.16%	19.29%	4.81%	15.09%	-1.13%	5.03%
GAPIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund	9.72%	21.72%	24.35%	20.67%	-18.97%	5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between GQFPX and GAPIX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between GQFPX and GAPIX has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GQFPX vs. GAPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQFPX

GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 33
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

GAPIX

GAPIX Risk / Return Rank: 57
GAPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
GAPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
GAPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
GAPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
GAPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQFPX vs. GAPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GQFPX	GAPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.80	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.45	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.33	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	2.46	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.23	10.60	-4.37

GQFPX vs. GAPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQFPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the GAPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQFPX and GAPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GQFPX vs. GAPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQFPX drawdown since its inception was -16.95%, smaller than the maximum GAPIX drawdown of -58.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQFPX and GAPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQFPX	GAPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.95%	-58.36%	+41.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.25%	-10.22%	+3.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.57%	-18.31%	+7.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.13%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.38%	-2.79%	-2.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-11.34%	+8.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	2.36%	-0.22%

Volatility

GQFPX vs. GAPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) is 3.72%, while Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund (GAPIX) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that GQFPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GQFPX	GAPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	5.96%	-2.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.09%	11.63%	-3.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.91%	14.05%	-4.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.83%	17.22%	-4.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.83%	18.00%	-5.17%

GQFPX vs. GAPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQFPX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than GAPIX's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQFPX vs. GAPIX - Dividend Comparison

GQFPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%, less than GAPIX's 13.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GAPIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund	13.20%	14.49%	14.79%	5.27%	6.66%	12.60%	2.64%	10.09%	2.88%	2.33%	1.56%	1.39%
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	5.96%	5.32%	3.71%	3.69%	5.18%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQFPX and GAPIX in my portfolio?

GQFPX and GAPIX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GQFPX or GAPIX?

GAPIX has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to GQFPX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQFPX dropped -16.95% vs GAPIX's -58.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GAPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.